Evaluation of physical activity program for students: development and validation of an instrument

Authors

  • Jaqueline Aragoni Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6344-9073
  • Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Ceará, Aracati, Ceará, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-4068
  • Danielle Biazzi Leal Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5392-5504
  • Camila Fabiana Rossi Squarcini Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1605-4834
  • Kelly Samara da Silva Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-1680

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.27e0286

Keywords:

Physical activity, Adolescent, Program evaluation

Abstract

This study aims to develop and validate an instrument that evaluates dimensions of planning and implementation of an intervention program focused on physical activity promotion in schoolers. It was conducted a methodological study carried out during the months of July to December of 2016, part of the Movimente Program. The study included theoretical (instrument development), empirical and analytical phases (content validadion by specialists, with scores atribution to each item, and by participants with characteristics similar to those of the target population, including school community, and students from 7th to 9th grade school). The instrument is composed by two dimensions: planning and process. Results show that planning was composed by indicators related to the importance of discussing health topics on the school context; interest in take part of the Program and its respective actions. Dimension included indicatos related to awaraness and evaluation program, and interest on program maintenance. All questions were considered valid (validation scores greater then 0.90) and with a good semantic (scores greated than 0.82). In conclusion, the instrument showed a reasonable quality regarding semantic and content validity, being considered apropriate for evaluation of Movimente Program and similar programs of physical activitiy programs in schoolers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jaqueline Aragoni Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.

Graduada em Educação Física pela Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC). Mestre e Doutoranda em Educação Física pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Membro do Núcleo de Pesquisa em Atividade Física e Saúde (NuPAF-UFSC).

References

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020;4(1):23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística, Coordenação de, População e Indicadores Sociais, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística B. Pesquisa nacional de saúde do escolar : 2019. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2021.

Neil-Sztramko SE, Caldwell H, Dobbins M. School‐based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Aug 15];(9). Available from: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3/full DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3

Barbosa Filho VC, Bandeira AS, Minatto G, Linard JG, Silva JA, Costa RM, et al. Effect of a multicomponent intervention on lifestyle factors among brazilian adolescents from low human development index areas: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16(2):267. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16020267

Assis MAA, Nahas MV, Barros MVG. O projeto “Saúde na Boa” na promoção de um estilo de vida saudável em escolares do ensino médio. Rev. Bras. Cineantropometria Desempenh. 2014;16(0):i–iii. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2014v16s1pi

Spohr C, Fortes M, Rombaldi A, Hallal P, Azevedo M. Atividade física e saúde na Educação Física escolar: efetividade de um ano do projeto “Educação Física +”. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2014;19(3):300–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.19n3p300

Silva KS, Silva JA, Barbosa Filho VC, Santos PC, Silveira PM, Lopes MVV, et al. Protocol paper for the Movimente school-based program: A cluster-randomized controlled trial targeting physical activity and sedentary behavior among Brazilian adolescents. Medicine. 2020;99(31):e21233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000021233

Borde R, Smith JJ, Sutherland R, Nathan N, Lubans DR. Methodological considerations and impact of school-based interventions on objectively measured physical activity in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Effects of measured PA interventions. Obes Rev. 2017;18(4):476–90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12517

Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front. Public Health. 2019;7:64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064

Van den Berg V, Salimi R, Groot R, Jolles J, Chinapaw M, Singh A. “It’s a battle… you want to do it, but how will you get it done?”: teachers’ and principals’ perceptions of implementing additional physical activity in school for academic performance. IJERPH. 2017;14(10):1160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14101160

Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. The Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337–48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0

Cassar S, Salmon J, Timperio A, Naylor PJ, van Nassau F, Contardo Ayala AM, et al. Adoption, implementation and sustainability of school-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in real-world settings: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0876-4

Naylor PJ, Nettlefold L, Race D, Hoy C, Ashe MC, Wharf Higgins J, et al. Implementation of school based physical activity interventions: A systematic review. Prev Med. 2015;72:95–115. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.12.034

Shah S, Allison KR, Schoueri-Mychasiw N, Pach B, Manson H, Vu-Nguyen K. A Review of Implementation Outcome Measures of School-Based Physical Activity Interventions. J Sch Health. 2017;87(6):474–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12514

Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;41(3):327–50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0

Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a Process-Evaluation Plan for Assessing Health Promotion Program Implementation: A How-To Guide. Health Promot. Pract. 2005;6(2):134–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839904273387

Santos SG. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa quantitativa aplicada à Educação Física. Vol. 1. Florianópolis: Tribo da Ilha; 2011. 237 p.

Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. Rio de Janeiro: Rio de Janeiro: Vozes; 2003.

Oliveira PS, Van Munster MA. Validação de conteúdo de um instrumento de avaliação do esquema corporal para crianças com cegueira. Revista Educação Especial. 2012;25(44):563–86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5902/1984686X5486

Gunther H. Como elaborar um questionário. Brasília, DF: UNB, Laboratório de Psicologia Ambiental; 2003. (Planejamento de Pesquisas nas Ciências Sociais).

Grant JS, Davis LL. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20(3):269–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Ciênc. Saúde Colet. 2011 Jul;16(7):3061–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000800006

Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655

Moore G, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Cooper C, et al. Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: the need for guidance. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2014;68(2):101–2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-202869

Bonell C, Fletcher A, Morton M, Lorenc T, Moore L. Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012;75(12):2299–306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.032

Sireci SG. The construct of content validity. Soc. Indic. Res. 1998;45(1):83–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006985528729

Published

2023-02-01

How to Cite

1.
Silva JA, Barbosa Filho VC, Leal DB, Squarcini CFR, Silva KS da. Evaluation of physical activity program for students: development and validation of an instrument. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2023 Feb. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];27:1-11. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/14912

Issue

Section

Original Articles