Short-term daily steps increment enhances submaximal exercise tolerance in healthy insuficiently active men

Autores/as

  • Luiz Porto Faculty of Physical Education, Cardiovascular Laboratory - Faculty of Medicine and Postgraduate Course of Medical Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
  • Keila Fontana University of Brasilia Faculty of Physical Education and Postgraduate Course of Physical Education, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
  • Guilherme Molina Faculty of Physical Education, Cardiovascular Laboratory - Faculty of Medicine - University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
  • Guilherme Rocco University of Brasilia Faculty of Physical Education and Postgraduate Course of Physical Education, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
  • Luiz Junqueira Jr. Cardiovascular Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Clinical Medicine Area and Postgraduate Course of Medical Sciences, University of Brasilia Faculty of Medicine, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.19n1p98

Palabras clave:

Walking, Pedometer, Physical activity, Inactivity, Health promotion

Resumen

The 10000 steps/day message has been proposed as a minimum steps/day target for healthy adults. Nevertheless, this target does not seem feasible as an initial goal for inactive adults. New strategies to progressively increase daily steps should be evaluated. The study evaluated the effectiveness of increase a pedometer-measured 3500 steps/day on physical performance at anaerobic threshold (AT). Nineteen healthy insufficiently active men, 19-46 yrs, wore a pedometer for 2 weeks to quantify their habitual daily steps at baseline. Afterwards, subjects were instructed to increase 3500 steps/day above baseline during 3 weeks (intervention). Cardiopulmonary exercise stress tests (CPX) were performed before and after the intervention. Submaximal exercise tolerance was analyzed by the heart rate at AT (HR-AT), the oxygen uptake at AT (VO2-AT), the time spent on CPX until AT onset and the reached distance. Nonparametric statistics were applied, expressing the results as median and minimum and maximum values. The variables were pair-wised compared by the Wilcoxon test. The differences were considered statistically significant when a two-tailed P-value was less than 5%. At baseline, median (min-max) of daily steps was 7295 (4700–14752 steps), whereas it was 11772 (8998–18620 steps) after the intervention (p=0.0001). On CPX, time until AT onset was higher after (359s; 179-521s) than before daily steps improvement (340s; 208-436s) (p=0.027). Similarly, the distance attained at AT was higher after (398.6m; 165.6–637.5m) than before the intervention (372.2m; 197.8–528.8m) (p=0.014). The increment of 3500 steps/day above baseline, during three weeks, was effective for improving exercise tolerance at AT.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Luiz Porto, Faculty of Physical Education, Cardiovascular Laboratory - Faculty of Medicine and Postgraduate Course of Medical Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

B.P.E., M.Sc., PhD., 

Keila Fontana, University of Brasilia Faculty of Physical Education and Postgraduate Course of Physical Education, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

B.P.E, M.Sc., Ph.D.

Guilherme Molina, Faculty of Physical Education, Cardiovascular Laboratory - Faculty of Medicine - University of Brasilia, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

B.P.E., M.Sc., Ph.D.,

Guilherme Rocco, University of Brasilia Faculty of Physical Education and Postgraduate Course of Physical Education, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

B.P.E., M.Sc.,

Luiz Junqueira Jr., Cardiovascular Laboratory, Cardiology Division, Clinical Medicine Area and Postgraduate Course of Medical Sciences, University of Brasilia Faculty of Medicine, Brasilia, DF, Brazil

B.Sc., M.D., M.Sc., Ph.D.,

Publicado

2014-02-19

Cómo citar

1.
Porto L, Fontana K, Molina G, Rocco G, Junqueira Jr. L. Short-term daily steps increment enhances submaximal exercise tolerance in healthy insuficiently active men. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 19 de febrero de 2014 [citado 22 de diciembre de 2024];19(1):98. Disponible en: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/3277

Número

Sección

Artículo original