Concurrent validity of the assessment tool for a health promotion program in Primary Health Care via telephone: a multilevel analysis

Authors

  • Marina Christofoletti Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5672-6869
  • Paula Fabricio Sandreski Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6487-2359
  • Humberto Moreira Carvalho Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2855-0296
  • Cassiano Schuaste de Souza Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2781-1551
  • Caroline Schramm Alves Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Universidade Regional de Blumenau, Departamento de Educação Física, Blumenau, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2373-9302
  • Juciléia Barbosa Bezerra Universidade Federal do Pará, Departamento de Educação Física, Castanhal, Pará, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4512-7542
  • Tania Rosane Bertoldo Benedetti Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2035-5082

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.29e0325

Keywords:

Validation study, Surveys and questionnaires, Program evaluation, Primary Health Care

Abstract

This study aims to verify the concurrent validity of the paper, and the telephone versions of the instrument used to evaluate the effectiveness of the Vida Ativa Melhorando a Saúde (VAMOS) Program participants. The VAMOS Program is a community-based intervention aiming at motivating people to adopt an active and healthy lifestyle. The sample for the validity test was two groups from different cities in Santa Catarina state. To compare each variable provided by paper and telephone format, multilevel generalized linear and logistic models were carried out, adjusted by age, sex, and school level. As a result, it was possible to identify the validity of most of the questions, with variations in the frequency of cooked vegetable consumption, method of preparing animal meat, frequency of physical activity, and waist circumference. We concluded that the use of the telephone survey could be considered for VAMOS Program evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marina Christofoletti, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Educação Física, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.

Possui graduação em Educação Física - Bacharelado pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2014), especialização em Fisiologia do Exercício - Prescrição de Exercícios na instituição Estácio de Sá (2016) e mestrado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, na área de Atividade Física Relacionada à Saúde (2017). Atualmente é aluna de doutorado no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. É membro do Núcleo de Pesquisa em Atividade Física e Saúde (NuPAF) e do Laboratório de Pesquisa em Envelhecimento, Mudança de Comportamento e Ambiente (LAMCE). Tem experiência na área de Educação Física, com ênfase em Atividade Física e Saúde, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: multimorbidade de doenças crônicas não transmissíveis, atividade física, comportamento sedentário, programas de mudança de comportamento e a Educação Física inserida no Sistema Único de Saúde.

References

Benedetti TRB, Schwingel A, Gomez LSR, Chodzko-Zajko W. Programa" VAMOS"(Vida Ativa Melhorando a Saúde): da concepção aos primeiros resultados. Braz J Kinathrop Hum Perform. 2012;14:723-37.

Benedetti T, Manta S, Gomez L, Rech C. Logical model of a behavior change program for community intervention–Active Life Improving Health–VAMOS. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2017;22(3):309-13.

Bize R, Willi C, Chiolero A, Stoianov R, Payot S, Locatelli I, et al. Participation in a population-based physical activity programme as an aid for smoking cessation: a randomised trial. Tob Control 2010, 19:488-494.

Ensenyat A, Espigares-Tribo G, Machado-Da-Silva L, Sinfreu-Bergués X, Blanco A. Semisupervised physical exercise and lifestyle counseling in cardiometabolic risk management in sedentary adults: controlled randomized trial (BELLUGAT). J Phys Act Health. 2020;17(7):744-55.

Lall R, Mistry D, Bridle C, Lamb SE. Telephone interviews can be used to collect follow-up data subsequent to no response to postal questionnaires in clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(1):90-9.

Jones TL, Baxter M, Khanduja V. A quick guide to survey research. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(1):5-7.

Silva MC, Ribeiro CG, Benedetti TRB. VAMOS program: instruments for measuring physical activity, feeding and anthropometry. Braz J Kinathrop Hum Perform. 2020;22.

Konrad LM, Ribeiro CG, Maciel EC, Tomicki C, Brito FA, Almeida FA et al. Evaluating the implementation of the active life improving health behavior change program "BCP-VAMOS" in primary health care: Protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial using the RE-AIM and CFIR frameworks. Front Public Health. 2022;10:726021.

Blumenberg C, Barros AJD. Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):765-73.

O'Hara BJ, Phongsavan P, Venugopal K, Eakin EG, Eggins D, Caterson H, et al. Effectiveness of Australia's Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service®: translational research with population wide impact. Prev Med. 2012;55(4):292-98.

Scarinci IC, Moore A, Wynn-Wallace T, Cherrington A, Fouad M, Li Y. A community-based, culturally relevant intervention to promote healthy eating and physical activity among middle-aged African American women in rural Alabama: findings from a group randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014;69:13-20.

Gill D, Blunt W, Boa Sorte Silva N, Stiller-Moldovan C, Zou G, Petrella R. The Health e Steps™ lifestyle prescription program to improve physical activity and modifiable risk factors for chronic disease: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1-15.

Glass DC, Kelsall HL, Slegers C, Forbes AB, Loff B, Zion D, et al. A telephone survey of factors affecting willingness to participate in health research surveys. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1017.

Porter ME. What is value in health care? NEJM. 2010;363(26):2477-2481.

Lam KH, Kwa VIH. Validity of the PROMIS-10 Global Health assessed by telephone and on paper in minor stroke and transient ischaemic attack in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 2018;8(7):e019919.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-19

How to Cite

1.
Christofoletti M, Sandreski PF, Carvalho HM, Souza CS de, Alves CS, Bezerra JB, et al. Concurrent validity of the assessment tool for a health promotion program in Primary Health Care via telephone: a multilevel analysis. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2024 Apr. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 15];29:1-6. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/15101

Issue

Vol. 29 (2024)

Section

Special section

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Brazilian Journal of Physical Activity & Health

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.