Objective physical activity in youth with spina bifida: a systematic review protocol

Authors

  • Daisy Souza Santos Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-2008
  • Ana Cláudia Mattiello-Sverzut Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4181-0718
  • Ana Clara Magalhães Franzoni Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6074-7742
  • Jeffer Eidi Sasaki Universidade do Triângulo Mineiro, Departamento de Ciências do Esporte, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física. Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2083-4104
  • Fabio Bertapelli Bertapelli Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Departamento de Ciências da Saúde, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2238-3842

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.28e0317

Keywords:

Crianças, Adolescentes, Inatividade física, Acelerometria

Abstract

aily physical activity (PA) is associated with improvements in health status in youth. However, evidence indicates that children with spina bifida (SB) are at risk for physical inactivity. This paper documents a systematic review protocol that aims to examine daily objective PA levels in children and adolescents with SB. This protocol was developed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015. The protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, CRD42022349920). The inclusion criteria are based on original articles: 1) published in peer-reviewed journals; 2) examining daily objective PA in children and adolescents with SB; and 3) using PA monitors to measure PA (e.g., accelerometers). Keywords were determined based on MeSH and existing literature. The following databases will be used as sources of information: PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, CINAHL, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Study and sample characteristics, PA variables (measurement protocols and PA classification cut-points) and PA levels results will be extracted from the studies. The quality of studies will be assessed with the Standard Quality Assessment Criteria for Evaluating Primary Research Papers from a Variety of Fields (ERA). The search and selection of articles, and extraction of data and quality assessment will be performed by two independent reviewers. It is expected that this study provides evidence to support prevention and treatment of physical inactivity and guide future research directions in objective PA in children and adolescents with SB.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Copp AJ, Adzick NS, Chitty LS, Fletcher JM, Holmbeck GN, Shaw GM. Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2015;(30)1:15007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.7

Atta CA, Fiest KM, Frolkis AD, Jette N, Pringsheim T, St Germaine-Smith C, et al. Global birth prevalence of spina bifida by folic acid fortification status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(1):e24–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302902

Rose BM, Holmbeck GN. Attention and executive functions in adolescents with spina bifida. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32(8):983–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm042

Leonardi-Figueiredo MM, Queiroz Davoli GB, Avi AE, Crescêncio JC, Moura-Tonello SC, Manso PH, et al. Cardiac autonomic modulation of heart rate recovery in children with spina bifida. Int J Sports Med. 2021;42(12):1113–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1393-6472

Widman LM, McDonald CM, Abresch RT. Effectiveness of an upper extremity exercise device integrated with computer gaming for aerobic training in adolescents with spinal cord dysfunction. J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(4):363–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2006.11753884

Mita K, Akataki K, Itoh K, Ono Y, Ishida N, Oki T. Assessment of obesity of children with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1993;35(4):305–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1993.tb11642.x

Bowman RM, McLone DG, Grant JA, Tomita T, Ito JA. Spina bifida outcome: a 25-year prospective. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2001;34(3):114–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000056005

Claridge EA, Bloemen MAT, Rook RA, Obeid J, Timmons BW, Takken T, et al. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour in children with spina bifida. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(12):1400–7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14333

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World health organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955

Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(1):23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2

Elmesmari R, Reilly JJ, Martin A, Paton JY. Accelerometer measured levels of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and sedentary time in children and adolescents with chronic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179429

Crytzer TM, Dicianno BE, Kapoor R. Physical activity, exercise, and health-related measures of fitness in adults with spina bifida: a review of the literature. PM R. 2013;5(12):1051–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.06.010

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols ( PRISMA-P ) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Amir-Behghadami M, Janati A. Population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study (PICOS) design as a framework to formulate eligibility criteria in systematic reviews. Emerg Med J. 2020;37(6):387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2020-209567

Sasaki J, Coutinho A, Santos C, Bertuol C, Minatto G, Berria J, et al. Orientações para utilização de acelerômetros no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2017;22(2):110–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.22n2p110-126

Kmet LM, Lee RC, Cook LS. Standard quality assessment criteria for evaluating primary research papers from a variety of fields. Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research; 2004. Disponível em: <https://era.library.ualberta.ca/items/48b9b989-c221-4df6-9e35-af782082280e> [2023 Fevereiro].

Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde, Departamento de Promoção da Saúde. Guia de atividade física para a população brasileira. Brasilia: Ministério da Saúde; 2021. Disponível em: <https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_atividade_fisica_populacao_brasileira.pdf> [2023 Fevereiro].

Published

2024-01-09

How to Cite

1.
Santos DS, Mattiello-Sverzut AC, Franzoni ACM, Sasaki JE, Bertapelli FB. Objective physical activity in youth with spina bifida: a systematic review protocol. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2024 Jan. 9 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];28:1-5. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/15087

Issue

Section

Study Protocols on Physical Activity and Health