Approaches and methods to assess sedentary behavior in Brazil: a systematic review

Authors

  • Luciana Leite Silva Barboza Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação Física, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3179-5630
  • Ellen Caroline Mendes da Silva Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9856-0054
  • Mabliny Thuany Universidade do Porto, Centro de Investigação, Formação, Inovação e Intervenção em Desporto, Faculdade de Desporto, Porto, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-1871
  • Raphael Henrique de Oliveira Araujo Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Londrina, Paraná, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9405-3052
  • André de Oliveira Werneck Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Núcleo de Pesquisas Epidemiológicas em Nutrição e Saúde, Departamento de Nutrição, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
  • David Nunes Oliveira Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação Física, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0110
  • Larissa Gandarela Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Departamento de Educação Física, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8022-9619
  • Danilo Rodrigues Pereira da Silva Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Departamento de Educação Física, São Cristóvão, Sergipe, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-4795

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.26e0236

Keywords:

Healthy lifestyle, Sedentary lifestyle, South America

Abstract

Our aim was to characterize the Brazilian studies that evaluated sedentary behavior, describing the main characteristics of the studies and identifying the used instruments. Using the PRISMA methodology, the search occurred on 25 August 2019 and was updated on 17 October 2020 in the following databases: PUBMED, LILACS, and SCIELO. Studies in English, Spanish, and Portuguese were included. The inclusion criteria were studies performed with a sample of Brazilians, and that used an instrument to evaluate sedentary behavior. In total, 229 articles were selected. The majority of the studies evaluated children and adolescents. Only 33 studies used device-derived measures and there was a great variability in the questionnaires used. Only 83/198 studies presented quality criteria for the instrument used. Most studies considered the screen time in a typical week plus weekend to characterize sedentary behavior. Therefore, sedentary behavior in Brazil has mostly been evaluated by different questionnaires, and few have been appropriately validated. These findings emphasize the importance of standardization and methodological rigor for assessing sedentary behavior in the Brazilian context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):1-17.

Loyen A, Chau JY, Jelsma JGM, van Nassau F, van der Ploeg HP. Prevalence and correlates of domain-specific sedentary time of adults in the Netherlands: findings from the 2006 Dutch time use survey. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(2):1-12.

Stamatakis E, Ekelund U, Ding D, Hamer M, Bauman AE, Lee I-M. Is the time right for quantitative public health guidelines on sitting? A narrative review of sedentary behaviour research paradigms and findings. Br J Sports Med. 2019;53(6):377-82.

Pandey A, Salahuddin U, Garg S, Ayers C, Kulinski J, Anand V et al. Continuous Dose-Response Association Between Sedentary Time and Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(5):575-83.

Tremblay MS, Colley RC, Saunders TJ, Healy GN, Owen N. Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010;35(6):725-40.

Rezende LFM, Rodrigues Lopes M, Rey-López JP, Matsudo VKR, Luiz O do C. Sedentary behavior and health outcomes: an overview of systematic reviews. PloS One. 2014;9(8):e105620.

Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(24):1451-62.

Ross R, Chaput J-P, Giangregorio LM, Janssen I, Saunders TJ, Kho ME et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Adults aged 18-64 years and Adults aged 65 years or older: an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10):S57-102.

Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput J-P, Connor Gorber S, Dinh T, Duggan M et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6):S311-27.

Virgara R, Phillips A, Lewis L, Richardson M, Maher C. Development of Australian physical activity and screen time guidelines for outside school hours care: an international Delphi study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021;18(1):1-14.

Okely AD, Ghersi D, Hesketh KD, Santos R, Loughran SP, Cliff DP et al. A collaborative approach to adopting/adapting guidelines - The Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the early years (Birth to 5 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(5):167-90.

Atkin AJ, Gorely T, Clemes SA, Yates T, Edwardson C, Brage S et al. Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: sedentary Behaviour. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(5):1460-71.

Owen N, Healy GN, Dempsey PC, Salmon J, Timperio A, Clark BK et al. Sedentary Behavior and Public Health: Integrating the Evidence and Identifying Potential Solutions. Annu Rev Public Health. 2020;41:265-87.

Bakker EA, Hartman YAW, Hopman MTE, Hopkins ND, Graves LEF, Dunstan DW et al. Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):1-31.

Chastin SFM, Dontje ML, Skelton DA, Čukić I, Shaw RJ, Gill JMR et al. Systematic comparative validation of self-report measures of sedentary time against an objective measure of postural sitting (activPAL). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):1-12.

Prince SA, Cardilli L, Reed JL, Saunders TJ, Kite C, Douillette K et al. A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):1-17.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097.

Bames J, Behrens TK, Benden ME, Biddle S, Bond D, Brassard P et al. Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms ‘sedentary’ and ‘sedentary behaviours’. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(3):540-2.

Ramires V, Becker L, Sadovsky A, Zago A, Bielemann R, Guerra P. Evolução da pesquisa epidemiológica em atividade física e comportamento sedentário no Brasil: atualização de uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saude. 2014;19(5):529–47.

Reilly JJ. When does it all go wrong? Longitudinal studies of changes in moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity across childhood and adolescence. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2016;14(1):1-6.

INEP. Estatísticas da educação básica no Brasil: 2019. Brasília: INEP; 2019. Available in <http://inep.gov.br/sinopses-estatisticas-da-educacao-basica > [2021 Julho].

Matthews CE, Kozey Keadle S, Moore SC, Schoeller DS, Carroll RJ, Troiano RP et al. Measurement of Active and Sedentary Behavior in Context of Large Epidemiologic Studies. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018;50(2):266-76.

Basterra-Gortari FJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Gea A, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Toledo E, Martínez-González MÁ. Television viewing, computer use, time driving and all-cause mortality: the SUN cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(3):e000864.

Kikuchi H, Inoue S, Sugiyama T, Owen N, Oka K, Nakaya T et al. Distinct associations of different sedentary behaviors with health-related attributes among older adults. Prev Med. 2014;67:335–9.

Hallgren M, Owen N, Stubbs B, Zeebari Z, Vancampfort D, Schuch F et al. Passive and mentally-active sedentary behaviors and incident major depressive disorder: A 13-year cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:579–85.

Prince SA, LeBlanc AG, Colley RC, Saunders TJ. Measurement of sedentary behaviour in population health surveys: a review and recommendations. PeerJ. 2017;5:e4130.

American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Public Education. American Academy of Pediatrics: Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics. 2001;107(2):423-6.

Magnon V, Dutheil F, Auxiette C. Sedentariness: A Need for a Definition. Front Public Health. 2018;6:372.

Dall PM, Coulter EH, Fitzsimons CF, Skelton DA, Chastin S, Seniors USP Team. TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e013844.

Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(12):992-7.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-14

How to Cite

1.
Barboza LLS, Silva ECM da, Thuany M, Araujo RH de O, Werneck A de O, Oliveira DN, et al. Approaches and methods to assess sedentary behavior in Brazil: a systematic review. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 14 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];26:1-29. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/14709

Issue

Vol. 26 (2021)

Section

Review Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Physical Activity & Health

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.