Validity of measure of sitting time of IPAQ Questionnaire short version in undergraduate from Brazil

Authors

  • Dayana Chaves Franco Centro Universitário de Maringá, Curso de Educação Física, Maringá, Paraná, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-4045
  • Gildeene Silva Farias Faculdade Estácio de Teresina, Curso de Educação Física, Teresina, Piauí, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2810-2925
  • Andreia Pelegrini Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Saúde e do Esporte, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil.
  • Jair Sindra Virtuoso Junior Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Departamento de Ciências do Esporte, Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brasil.
  • Thiago Ferreira de Sousa Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, Centro de Formação de Professores, Amargosa, Bahia, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9846-9661

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.26e0223

Keywords:

Sedentary behavior, Students, Validation studies

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to estimate the level of reproducibility of the sitting time measurements of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-short version), and to analyze the concurrent validity of these measurements in relation the sedentary time measured by the accelerometer, in university students. A correlational study was carried out with a sample of 61 university students of a higher education institution from Minas Gerais, Brazil, who self-completed the IPAQ sitting time measurements, with interval of seven days for the purposes of the reproducibility analysis and used the accelerometer to estimate sedentary time and employment as the gold standard in the analysis of concurrent validity. The correlation analyzes via intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman scatter plot were used to analyze the agreement. The significance level adopted was 5%. The average age was 21.54 years and 62.3% were female. The reproducibility of sitting time on a weekday was moderate (ICC = 0.51; p < 0.01), while on a weekend day it was low (ICC = 0.30; p = 0.01). The mean differences between sitting time using the IPAQ and sedentary time using the accelerometer on a weekday was -51 minutes and on a weekend was -64.7 minutes. Concluded that there were satisfactory correlations and agreements both in reproducibility and in comparison, with the criterion measure (accelerometer) of the sitting time measures measured by the IPAQ for application in university students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dunstan DW, Dogra S, Carter SE, Owen N. Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: emerging insights and opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol [journal on the internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jul 15]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-021-00547-y

Saunders TJ, McIsaac T, Douillette K, Gaulton N, Hunter S, Rhodes RE et al. Sedentary behaviour and health in adults: an overview of systematic reviews. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020;45(10):S197-S217.

Martínez-Ramos E, Beltran AM, Martín-Borràs C, Lasaosa-Medina L, Real J, Trujillo JM et al. Patterns of sedentary behavior in overweight and moderately obese users of the Catalan primary-health care system. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0190750.

Pozo-Cruz B, Alfonso-Rosa RM, McGregor D, Chastin SF, Palarea-Albaladejo J, del Pozo-Cruz J. Sedentary behaviour is associated with depression symptoms: compositional data analysis from a representative sample of 3233 US adults and older adults assessed with accelerometers. J Affect Disord. 2020;265(6):59-62.

Ku PW, Steptoe A, Liao Y, Hsueh MC, Chen LJ. A cut-off of daily sedentary time and all-cause mortality in adults: a meta-regression analysis involving more than 1 million participants. BMC Med. 2018;16(74):16-74.

Meneguci J, Santos DAT, Silva RB, Santos RG, Sasaki JE, Tribess S, et al. Comportamento sedentário: conceito, implicações fisiológicas e os procedimentos de avaliação. Motri. 2015;11(1):160-74.

Prince SA, Melvin A, Roberts KC, Butler GP, Thompson W. Sedentary behaviour surveillance in Canada: trends, challenges and lessons learned. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):34.

Silva Filho RCS, Lemes TMMA, Sasaki JE, Gordia AP, Andaki ACR. Comportamento sedentário em adolescentes brasileiros: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2020;25:e0139.

Franco DC, Ferraz NL, Sousa TF. Comportamento sedentário em universitários: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Cineantropom Hum. 2019;21:e56485.

Warren LM, Ekelund U, Besson H, Mezzani A, Geladas N, Vanhees L. Assessment of physical activity - a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010;17(2):127-39.

Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Terminology Consensus Project Participants. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):75.

Guedes DP, Lopes CC; Guedes JERP. Reprodutibilidade e validade do Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física em adolescentes. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2005;36(1):79-97.

Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and vality. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381-5.

Hallal PC, Victora CG. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ). Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(3):556.

Matsudo S, Araújo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, et al. Questionário internacional de atividade física (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras de Ativ Fis Saúde. 2001;6(2):5-18.

Benedetti TB, Antunes PC, Rodrigues-Añez CR, Mazo GZ, Petroski EL. Reprodutibilidade e validade do Questionário Internacional de Atividade Física (IPAQ) em homens idosos. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2007;13(1):11-6.

Arango-Vélez EF, Echavarría-Rodríguez AM, Aguilar-González FA, Patiño-Villada FA. Validación de dos cuestionarios para evaluar el nivel de actividad física y el tiempo sedentario en una comunidad universitaria de Colombia. Rev Salud Pública. 2020;38(1):e334156.

Sousa TF. Inatividade física em universitários brasileiros: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ciênc Saúde. 2011;9(29):47-55.

Lourenço CLM, Sousa TF, Fonseca SA, Virtuoso Junior JS, Barbosa AR. Comportamento sedentário em estudantes universitários. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2016;21(1):67-77.

Prat IA, Viñolas EC, Cañas JCM, Wasley DA, Puig-Ribera A. From secondary school to university: associations between sport participation and total and domain-specific sedentary behaviours in Spanish students. Eur J Pediatr. 2020:179(10):1635-45.

Tavares CC, Cornélio, MPM; Nardelli GG, Gaudenci EM, Haas VJ, Pedrosa LAK. Saúde e qualidade de vida de universitários da área da saúde. Rev Fam Ciclos Vida Saúde Contexto Soc. 2019;7(1):53-64.

Healy GN, Clark BK, Winkler EA, Gardiner PA, Brown WJ, Matthews CE. Measurement of Adults’ Sedentary Time in Population-Based Studies. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):216-27.

Rosenberger ME, Haskell WL, Albinali F, Mota S, Nawyn J, Intille S. Estimating activity and sedentary behavior fron an accelerometer on the hip or wrist. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013;45(5):964-75.

Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-81.

Broeck JV, Cunningham SA, Eeckels R, Herbst K. Data cleaning: detecting, diagnosing, and editing data abnormalities. PLoS Med. 2005;2(10):966-70.

Ministério da Educação do Brasil. Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. Tabela de áreas de conhecimento/avaliação. Brasília: Ministério da Educação do Brasil; 2017.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10.

Mukaka MM. Statistics Corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012;24(3):69-71.

Bakker EA, Hartman YAW, Hopman MTE, Hopkins ND, Graves LEF, Dunstan DW et al. Validity and reliability of subjective methods to assess sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):75.

Sousa TF, Farias GS, Franco DC. Self-reported of sedentary behavior by isaq-a questionnaire for application in undergraduate: analysis of reliability and concurrent validity. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov. 2020;28(1):155-61.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-07

How to Cite

1.
Franco DC, Farias GS, Pelegrini A, Virtuoso Junior JS, Sousa TF de. Validity of measure of sitting time of IPAQ Questionnaire short version in undergraduate from Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 7 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];26:1-9. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/14538

Issue

Vol. 26 (2021)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Brazilian Journal of Physical Activity & Health

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.