Concordância na velocidade da marcha de mulheres diabéticas tipo 2 em diferentes testes de caminhada

Authors

  • Leandro Quadro Corrêa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Curso de Educação Física, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1231-3800
  • Airton José Rombaldi Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Escola Superior de Educação Física, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6707-814X
  • Fernanda de Souza Teixeira Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Escola Superior de Educação Física, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7819-9142
  • Daniel Umpierre Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Curso de Saúde Coletiva, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Centro de Pesquisa Clínica, Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6953-0163
  • Marlos Rodrigues Domingues Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Escola Superior de Educação Física, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2503-2944

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.25e0157

Keywords:

Teste de caminhada, Velocidade da marcha, Mulheres, Diabetes mellitus tipo 2, Centros de saúde

Abstract

This study aimed to test the agreement in the gait speed (GS) between the 6-minute walk test and the 4-meter gait speed (6MWT - 4MWT) in type 2 diabetic women (T2DM). The tests were performed before and after a 12-week physical exercise intervention. The 4MWT was performed in a space of four meters, with results based on the time spent (seconds) to complete a 4-meter distance. The 6MWT was carried out similar to a yo-yo test in 15 meters and the result was operationalized by the total distance (meters) covered. The results of the tests were standardized as speed (m/s). To evaluate agreements (6MWTbefore x 4MWTbefore) and (6MWTafter x 4MWTafter), Bland-Altman (B-A), and Lin's agreements were used. The level of significance was set at 5%. A total of 39 women were evaluated, mean age 58.79 ± 10.03 years, diagnosis of diabetes at 8.64 ± 8.53 years. The B-A test showed a mean difference in GS of -0.001 ± 0.19 m/s (95%CI: -0.37 to 0.37 m/s) before and 0.02 ± 0.21 m/s (95%CI: -0.39 to 0.42 m/s) after, and Lin’s agreements of 0.60 (95%CI: 0.41 to 0.79; p < 0.001)  and 0.52 (95%CI: 0.31 to 0.73; p < 0.001) before and after, respectively. Based on our data it is suggested that the two tests can be used to evaluate the GS of T2DM women, but the 6MWT was more reproductible to detect changes in GS over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Leandro Quadro Corrêa, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Curso de Educação Física, Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

Possui Doutorado pelo Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação Física da Universidade Federal de Pelotas. É mestre em ciências pelo pelo mesmo programa (2009) e concluiu a especialização em Atividade Física e Saúde por esta mesma universidade (2007). É graduado em Educação Física pela Universidade Federal de Pelotas (2005) e em Pedagogia pela Universidade Católica de Pelotas (1998). É professor adjunto da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande (FURG) com atividades no curso de Licenciatura em Educação Física e na Residência Integrada Multiprofissional Hospitalar com Ênfase na Atenção à Saúde Cardiometabólica do Adulto (RIMHAS) onde também exerce função de coordenador desta Residência.

References

Perera S, Patel KV, Rosano C, Rubin SM, Satterfield S, Harris T, et al. Gait Speed Predicts Incident Disability: A Pooled Analysis. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(1):63–71.

Studenski S, Perera S, Patel K, Rosano C, Faulkner K, Inzitari M, et al. Gait speed and survival in older adults. JAMA. 2011;305(1):50-8.

Volpato S, Bianchi L, Lauretani F, Lauretani F, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, et al. Role of muscle mass and muscle quality in the association between diabetes and gait speed. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(8):1672-9.

Fregonesi CEPT, Camargo MR. Gait parameters in patients with diabetes mellitus. Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum. 2010;12(2):155-63.

Bautmans I, Lambert M, Mets T. The six-minute walk test in community dwelling elderly: influence of health status. BMC Geriatrics. 2004; 4:6.

Chung C, Maldonado DAP, Jor'dan AJ, Alfaro FJ, Lioutas V, Núñez MZ, et al. Lower cerebral vasoreactivity as a predictor of gait speed decline in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Neurol. 2018;265(10):2267-76.

Cheung C, Lam KSL, Cheung BMY. Diabetes is associated with increased risks of low lean mass and slow gait speed when peripheral artery disease is present. J Diabetes Complications. 2016;30(2):306-11.

Allet L, Armand S, Bie RA, Golay A, Pataky Z, Aminian K, et al. Clinical factors associated with gait alterations in diabetic patients. Diabet Med. 2009;26(10):1003-9.

Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Pieper CF, Leveille SG, Markides KS, Ostir GV, et al. Lower extremity function and subsequent disability: consistency across studies, predictive models, and value of gait speed alone compared with the short physical performance battery. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(4):M221-31.

Burr JF, Bredin SSD, Faktor MD, Warburton DER. The 6-minute walk test as a predictor of objectively measured aerobic fitness in healthy working-aged adults. Phys Sports Med. 2011;39(2):133-9.

Bohannon RW, Bubela D, Magasi S, McCreath H, Wang Y-C, Reuben D, et al. Comparison of walking performance over the first 2 minutes and the full 6 minutes of the Six-Minute Walk Test. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):269.

Guerra-Balic M, Oviedo GR, Javierre C, Fortuño J, Barnet-López S, Niño O, et al. Reliability and validity of the 6-min walk test in adults and seniors with intellectual disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2015; 47:144-53.

Ratter J, Radlinger L, Lucas C. Several submaximal exercise tests are reliable, valid, and acceptable in people with chronic pain, fibromyalgia, or chronic fatigue: A systematic review. J Physiother. 2014;60(3):144-50.

Cesari M, Scarlata S. What the 4-meter gait speed measures and why it cannot replace functional capacity tests. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(6):1819-20.

American Thoracic Society. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111-7.

DePew ZS, Karpman C, Novotny PJ, Benzo RP. Correlations between gait speed, six-minute walk, physical activity, and self-efficacy in severe chronic lung disease. Respir Care. 2013;58(12):2113-9.

Tino VYK, Morita AA, Bisca GW, Guzzi G, Machado FVC, Hernande NA, et al. Qual o melhor protocolo e ponto de corte no teste 4-metre gait speed para discriminar capacidade de exercício na DPOC? J Bras Pneumol. 2020;46(6):e20190232.

Maggio M, Ceda GP, Ticinesi A, Vita F, Gelmini G, Costantino C, et al. Istrumental and non-instrumental evaluation of 4-meter walking speed in older individuals. PLos One. 2016;11(4): e0153583.

Ministério da Saúde. Vigitel Brasil 2015: vigilância de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas por inquérito telefônico: estimativas sobre frequência e distribuição sociodemográfica de fatores de risco e proteção para doenças crônicas nas capitais dos 26 estados brasileiros e no Distrito Federal em 2015. Brasília. 2016; Disponível em: < http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/vigitel_brasil_2015.pdf> [2020 outubro].

Fonteles AI, Machado DGS, Agrícola PMD, Neto LIN, Moreira SR, Elsangedy HM, et al. Reliability of the 6-minute walk test and cardiac autonomic markers in active and sedentary older women. Rev. bras. cineantropom. desempenho hum. 2016;18(3):287-96.

Kon SS, Patel MS, Canavan JL, Clark AL, Jones SE, Nolan CM, et al. Reliability and validity of 4-metre gait speed in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(2):333-40.

Munro B. Statistical methods for health care research. 3ª ed. New York: Lippincott, 1997.

Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-10.

Lin L, Torbeck LD. Coefficient of accuracy and concordance correlation coefficient: new statistics for methods comparison. PDA J Pharm Sci Technol. 1998;52(2):55-9.

Gaya A. Ciências do movimento humano: introdução a metodologia da pesquisa. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2008.

Altman DG, Altman E. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC, 1999.

Forrest GF, Hutchinson K, Lorenz DJ, Buehner JJ, VanHiel LR, Sisto SA, et al. Are the 10 Meter and 6 Minute Walk Tests Redundant in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury? PLos One. 2014;9(5):e94108.

Uitman MB, Port IV, Kwakkel G. Is gait speed or walking distance a better predictor for community walking after stroke? J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(6):535-40.

Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H, Husu P, Vähä-Ypyä H, Valkeinen H, et al. Six-minute walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018;38(6):1038-45.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-11

How to Cite

1.
Corrêa LQ, Rombaldi AJ, Teixeira F de S, Umpierre D, Domingues MR. Concordância na velocidade da marcha de mulheres diabéticas tipo 2 em diferentes testes de caminhada . Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2020 Dec. 11 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];25:1-8. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/14289

Issue

Vol. 25 (2020)

Section

Original Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Leandro Quadro Corrêa, Airton José Rombaldi , Fernanda de Souza Teixeira, Daniel Umpierre, Marlos Rodrigues Domingues

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.