Reach of physical activity interventions in the public health of Santa Catarina

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.23e0066

Keywords:

Program Evaluation, Health Promotion, Public Health

Abstract

In order to verify the reach of Physical Activity Interventions (PAI) in the public health of Santa Catarina, the size of municipalities, the link with physical activity promotion strategies, population groups served and characteristics of the participants, 146 PAI coordinators of the Municipal Health Secretariats of Santa Catarina were questioned. The reach was calculated by dividing the number of participants in PAI by the total and stratified population and by the age groups (children, adolescents, adults and the elderly). The PAI absolute reach was 3,8% and the relative 4,9%. The highest values of absolute and relative reach were among the older adults (8.4% and 8.8%, respectively) and those linked to the Health Academy program, in all populations groups served (5% and 7%, respectively). About 56.3% of the IAF serve less than 100 people, with greater participation of the adult and elderly public. Community agent was the most prevalent form of recruitment (95,3%) and “have physician's indication or authorization" as a criterion for participation (79.2%). It is concluded that there is a low population reach in the Municipal Health Secretariat’s PAI of Santa Catarina, and it is necessary to rethink its programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Malta D, Silva M, Albuquerque G, Amorim R, Rodrigues G, Silva T, et al. Política Nacional de Promoção da Saúde, descrição da implementação do eixo atividade física e práticas corporais, 2006 a 2014. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2014;19(3):286-99.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Portaria GM n.154, de 24 de janeiro de 2008. Cria os núcleos de Apoio à Saúde da Família – NASF. Brasília; 2008. Diário Oficial da União, 25 Jan. 2008.

Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC, et al. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337-48.

Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9);1322-7.

Almeida FA, Pardo KA, Seidel RW, Davy BM, You W, Wall SS, et al. Design and methods of “diaBEAT-it!”: a hybrid preference/randomized control trial design using the RE-AIM framework. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014;38(2):383–96.

Almeida FA, Brito FA, Estabrooks PA. Modelo RE-AIM: tradução e adaptação cultural para o Brasil. Rev Fam Ciclos Vida Saúde Contexto Soc. 2013;1(1):6-16.

Lee RE, Galavíz KI, Soltero EG, Rosales CJ, Jauregui E, Lévesque L, et al. Aplicando o modelo RE-AIM para a promoção da atividade física em países de baixa e média renda. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2017;25(e2923):1-9.

Jung ME, Bourne JE, Gainforth HL. Evaluation of a community-based, family focused healthy weights initiative using the RE-AIM framework. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(13):1-16.

Glasgow RE, Lichtenstein E, Marcus AC. Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(8):1261-7.

Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38-e46.

Harden SM, Fanning JT, Motl RW, McAuley E, Estabrooks PA. Determining the reach of a home-based physical activity program for older adults within the context of a randomized controlled trial. Health Educ Res. 2014;5(31):1-9.

Loch MR, Rodrigues CG, Teixeira DC. E os homens? E os que moram longe? E os mais jovens?...? Perfil dos usuários de programas de atividade física oferecidos pelas Unidades Básicas de Saúde de Londrina-PR. Rev. Bras Ciênc Esporte. 2013;35(4):947-61.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Histórico de Cobertura da Saúde da Família. 2015. Disponível em: http://dab.saude.gov.br/portaldab/historico_cobertura_sf.php.

Sá GBAR, Dornelles GC, Cruz KG, Amorim RCA, Andrade SSCA, Oliveira TP, et al. O Programa Academia da Saúde como estratégia de promoção da saúde e modos de vida saudáveis: cenário nacional de implementação. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva. 2016;21(6):1849-59.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Panorama nacional de implementação do Programa Academia da Saúde: monitoramento nacional da gestão do Programa Academia da Saúde ciclo 2016. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde, Departamento de Vigilância de Doenças e Agravos não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. – Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2017.

Barlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC. Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal. 2001;19(1):43-50.

Barros M, Lemos E, Silva J, Silva C, Fosenca S, Tassitano R. Evaluation of programs and interventions for physical activity promotion in primary health care in Pernambuco: construction and validation of instruments and fieldwork methods of the SUS+ativo Project. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2016;21(5):388-99.

Rajendran S. Sustainable Construction Safety and Health Rating System. Dissertation, Oregon State University, 2006.

PNUD. Programa das Nações Unidas para o Desenvolvimento. Atlas do Desenvolvimento Humano no Brasil, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.atlasbrasil.org.br/.

IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Centro de Referência em Nomes Geográficos. 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ngb.ibge.gov.br/?pagina=meso.

Acker R, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K, Klesges LM, Cardon G. The impact of disseminating the whole-community project'10,000 Steps': a RE-AIM analysis. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1);1-11.

Sweet SN, Ginis KAM, Estabrooks PA, Latimer-Cheung AE. Operationalizing the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of multi-sector partnerships. Implement Sci. 2014;9(74):1-10.

Sandreschi P, Petreça D, Mazo G. Avaliação de um programa universitário de atividade física para idosos pelo modelo RE-AIM. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2015;20(3):270-83.

Nunes EFPA, Santini SML, Carvalho BG, Junior LC. Força de trabalho em saúde na Atenção Básica em Municípios de Pequeno Porte do Paraná. Saúde Debate. 2015;39(104):29-41.

Gomes GADO, Kokubun E, Mieke GI, Ramos LR, Pratt M, Parra DC, et al. Characteristics of physical activity programs in the Brazilian primary health care system. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2014;30(10):2155-68.

Amorim TC, Knuth AG, Cruz DKA, Malta DC, Reis RS, Hallal PC. Descrição dos programas municipais de promoção da atividade física financiados pelo Ministério da Saúde. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2013;18(1):63-74.

Ball K, Abbott G, Wilson M, Chisholm M, Sahlqvist S. How to get a nation walking: reach, retention, participant characteristics and program implications of Heart Foundation Walking, a nationwide Australian community-based walking program. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(161):1-10.

Schoeppe S, Oliver M, Badland HM, Burke M, Duncan MJ. Recruitment and retention of children in behavioral health risk factor studies: REACH strategies. Int J Behav Med. 2014;21(5):794-803.

Ginis KAM, Latimer-Cheung A, Corkum S, Ginis S, Anathasopoulos P, Arbour-Nicitopoulos K, et al. A case study of a community-university multidisciplinary partnership approach to increasing physical activity participation among people with spinal cord injury. Transl Behav Med. 2012;4(2):516-22.

Konrad LM, Tomicki C, Silva MC, Almeida F, Benedetti T. Avaliação de programas de mudança de comportamento usando a ferramenta RE-AIM: um estudo de revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2017;22(5):439-349.

Published

2019-08-07

How to Cite

1.
Fank F, Petreça DR, Almeida FA, Mazo GZ. Reach of physical activity interventions in the public health of Santa Catarina. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2019 Aug. 7 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];23:1-8. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/13729

Issue

Section

Original Articles