Built environment and physical activity for the elderly: a systematic review of South Ame

Authors

  • Hermes Koller De Paiva Federal University of Paraná, Graduate Physical Education Program, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2523-5354
  • Édina Maria de Camargo Federal University of Paraná, Graduate Physical Education Program, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Federal University of Paraná, Center for Physical Activity and Health Studies, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-2606
  • Rodrigo Siqueira Reis Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Physical Activity and Quality of Life Research Group, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. Washington University in Saint Louis, Brown School, Prevention Research Center, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA. Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Graduate Program in Urban Management. Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-9865

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.23e0024

Keywords:

Motor activity, Built environment, Elderly

Abstract

A systematic review was conducted to evaluate studies on the association between the characteristics of a built environment and levels of physical activity (LPA) of elderly people in South America. The searches were conducted on the Bireme, SciElo, Web Of Science and Scopus databases in 2017. Empirical quantitative studies published in Portuguese, English and Spanish, starting in 1990, were included to provide information on the relationship between a built environment and physical activity (PA) for older adults in South America. After the exclusion of repeated titles, 9,592 studies were found, only nine of which were selected, all with a cross-sectional design and samples composed of both sexes, and 77.8% carried out in Brazil. Most of the studies (66.7%) used the abbreviated version of the Neighborhood Environment Walkability Scale (NEWS-A Brazil) to evaluate the built environment and 88.9% used the International Physical Activity Questionnaire to evaluate LPA. Total walking distance (leisure and active transport) was investigated in 22.2% of the studies, leisure PA in 55.5% and displacement PA in 44.4%. The presence of PA facilities and services was associated with LPA, as well as connectivity, street incline and perceived safety. It was concluded that the installation of PA facilities, as well as improved safety, can increase the LPA of the elderly. In addition, satellite image information and audits should be considered when evaluating the built environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Mathers CD, Stevens GA, Boerma T, White RA, Tobias MI. Causes of international increases in older age life expectancy. Lancet. 2015;385(9967):540-48.
2. Yen IH, Michael YL, Perdue L. Neighborhood environment in studies of health of older adults. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37(5):455-63. 

3. Giehl MWC, Hallal PC, Corseuil CW, Schneider IJC, DOrsi E. Built environment and walking behavior among Brazilian older adults: a population-based study. J Phys Act Heal. 2016;13:617-24. 

4. Cain KL, Millstein RA, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Gavand KA, Frank LD, et al. Contribution of streetscape audits to explanation of physical activity in four age groups based on the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). Soc Sci Med. 2014;116:82-92. 

5. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;380(9838):258-71. 

6. Sallis JF, Cervero RB, Ascher W, Henderson KA, Kraft MK, Kerr J. An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Heal. 2006;27:297-322. 

7. Sugiyama T, Neuhaus M, Cole R, Giles-Corti B, Owen N. Destination and route attributes associated with adults’ walking: a review. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012;1275-86. 

8. Parra DC, Gomez LF, Fleischer NL, David J. Built environment characteristics and perceived active park use among older adults: results from a multilevel study in Bogota. Heal Place. 2010;16(6):1174-81. 

9. Procter-Gray E, Leveille SG, Hannan MT, Cheng J, Kane K, Li W. Variations in community prevalence and determinants of recreational and utilitarian walking in older age. J Aging Res. 2015;2015:1-11. 

10. Cauwenberg J Van, Clarys P, Bourdeaudhuij I, Holle V Van, Verté D, Witte N, et al. Physical environmental factors related to walking and cycling in older adults: the Belgian aging studies. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):142-55. 

11. Cerin E, Lee K, Barnett A, Sit CHP, Cheung M, Chan W, et al. Walking for transportation in Hong Kong chinese urban elders: a cross-sectional study on what destinations matter and when. Int J Behav Med. 2013;10(78):1-10. 

12. Nathan A, Pereira G, Foster S, Hooper P, Saarloos D, Giles-corti B. Access to commercial destinations within the neighbourhood and walking among Australian older adults. Int J Behav Med. 2012;9(133):1–8. 

13. Cauwenberg J Van, Bourdeaudhuij I, Meester F, Dyck D Van, Salmon J, Clarys P, et al. Relationship between the physical environment and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Heal Place. 2011;17(2):458–69. 

14. Hino AAF, Reis RS, Florindo AA. Ambiente construído e atividade física: uma breve revisão dos métodos de avaliação. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2010;12(5):387–94. 

15. Annear M, Keeling S, Wilkinson T, Cushman G, Gidlow B, Hopkins H. Environmental influences on healthy and active ageing: a systematic review. Ageing Soc. 2014;34(4):590–22. 

16. Carlson JA, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD, Kerr J, et al. Interactions between psychosocial and built environment factors in explaining older adults’ physical activity. Prev Med. 2012;54(1):68–73. 

17. Cerin E, Nathan A, Cauwenberg J Van, Barnett DW, Barnett A. The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Med. 2017;14(15):1–23. 

18. Brasil. Estatuto do idoso. Brasil; 2013 p. 72. Available from: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/estatuto_ idoso_3edicao.pdf 

19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzla J, Altman DG, Group TP. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):1–6. 

20. Brasil. Diretrizes metodológicas: elaboração de revisão sistemática e metanálise de estudos observacionais comparativos sobre fatores de risco e prognóstico. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014. 130 p. 

21. Malavasi LM, Duarte MFS, Both J, Reis RS. Escala de mobilidade ativa no ambiente comunitário – NEWS Brasil: retradução e reprodutibilidade. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2007;9(4):339–50. 

22. Matsudo S, Araujo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, et al. Questionario internacional de atividade fisica (IPAQ): estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fis e Saúde. 2001;6(2):5–18. 
23. Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. A prática de caminhada como forma de deslocamento e sua associação com a percepção do ambiente am idosos. Rev Bras Ativ Fis e Saúde. 2009;14(3):197–205. 

24. Salvador EP, Florindo AA, Reis RS, Costa EF. Percepção do ambiente e prática de atividade física no lazer entre idosos. Rev Saúde Públ. 2009;43(6):972–80. 

25. Gómez LF, Parra DC, Buchner D, Brownson RC, Sarmiento OL, Pinzón JD, et al. Built environment attributes and walking patterns among the elderly population in Bogotá. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(6):592–99. 

26. Li F, Fisher KJ, Brownson RC, Bosworth M. Related to neighbourhood walking activity in older adults. J Epidemiol Community Heal. 2005;59:558–64. 

27. Salvador EP, Reis RS, Florindo AA. Practice of walking and its association with perceived environment among elderly Brazilians living in a region of low socioeconomic level. Int J Behav Med. 2010;7(67):1–7. 

28. Corseuil MW, Jayce I, Schneider C, Santos DA, Costa FF, Silva KS, et al. Perception of environmental obstacles to commuting physical activity in Brazilian elderly. Prev Med. 2011;53(4–5):289–92. 

29. Giehl MWC, Schneider IJC, Corseuil HX, Benedetti TRB, DOrsi E. Atividade física e percepção do ambiente em idosos: estudo populacional em Florianópolis. Rev Saúde Públ. 2012;46(3):516–25. 

30. Giehl MWC, Hallal PC, Brownson RC, D’Orsi E. Exploring associations between perceived measures of the environment and walking among Brazilian older adults. J Aging Heal. 2017;29(1):45–67. 

31. Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2016;6736(15):1–10. 

32. Maisel JL. Impact of older adults’ neighborhood perceptions on walking behavior. J Aging Phys Act. 2016;24(2006):247–55. 

33. Pelclová J, Frömel K, Bláha L, Zaj I, Tlu L. Neighborhood environment and walking for transport and recreation in central European older adults. Acta Univ Palacki Olomuc. 2012;42(4):49–56. 

34. Jung TC, Lee S, Kawakubo K. Features of perceived neighborhood environment associated with daily walking time or habitual exercise: differences across gender, age, and employment status in a community – dwelling population of Japan. Env Heal Prev Med. 2013;18:368–76. 

35. Gallagher NA, Clarke PJ, Gretebeck KA. Gender differences in neighborhood walking in older adults. J Aging Heal. 2014;26(8):1280–300. 

36. Barnett A, Cerin E, Zhang CJP, Sit CHP, Johnston JM, Cheung MMC, et al. Associations between the neighbourhood environment characteristics and physical activity in older adults with speci c types of chronic conditions: the ALECS cross- sectional study. Int J Behav Med. 2016;13:53–66. 

37. Sallis JF, Slymen DJ, Conway TL, Frank LD, Saelens BE, Cain K, et al. Income disparities in perceived neighborhood built and social environment attributes. Heal Place. 2011;17:1274–83. 

38. Bertoni WL, Florindo AA, Salvador EP, Reis RS. Desenvolvimento e reprodutibilidade de um instrumento de avaliação objetiva do ambiente para aplicação em estudos de atividade física. Rev Bras Ativ Fis e Saúde. 2009;14(1):38–47.
39. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2003;1381–395. 

40. Hallal PC, Gomez LF, Parra DC, Lobelo F, Mosquera J, Florindo AA, et al. Lessons learned after 10 years of IPAQ use in Brazil and Colombia. J Phys Act Heal. 2010;7(Suppl 2):259–64. 

41. Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK. Physical activity in U.S. adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. AmJ Prev Med. 2011;40(4):454–61. 

42. Millstein RA, Cain KL, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Geremia C, Frank LD, et al. Development , scoring , and reliability of the Microscale Audit of Pedestrian Streetscapes (MAPS). BMC Public Health. 2013;403(13):1–15. 


Downloads

Published

2018-10-19

How to Cite

1.
De Paiva HK, Camargo Édina M de, Reis RS. Built environment and physical activity for the elderly: a systematic review of South Ame. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2018 Oct. 19 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];23:1-8. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/13054

Issue

Section

Review Articles