Análise do equilíbrio corporal e aptidão física de indivíduos em tratamento para dependência química
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.23e0012Keywords:
Alcoolismo, Abuso de drogas, Equilíbrio postural, Aptidão físicaAbstract
Alcohol and drugs abuse can have negative effects on motor skills and physical capabilities. Several studies have demonstrated the precariousness of the physical fitness levels of individuals with chemical dependence, and that variables of physical fitness and body balance are influenced by prolonged consumption of these substances even after cessation of use. The objective of the study was to evaluate indicators of physical fitness and body balance of individuals hospitalized for treatment of chemical dependence, relating the data to the time of drug or alcohol use. Anthropometric, flexibility, agility and balance indicators of 46 adult individuals (14 women and 32 men with 38.3 ± 12.9 years) were analyzed, and they also answered an anamnesis. Descriptive statistics, Student’s t test, Mann Whitney and Spearman’s correlation were used, adopting p ≤ 0.05. Results showed a higher prevalence of male patients, dependent on multiple substances, low level of schooling, consumption time of more than 10 years and who did not practice regular physical activity prior to hospitalization. The longer the time of drug use, the worse the results in the agility and balance tests, both with open eyes and closed eyes. It is possible to conclude that both the advancing age and the greater dependence time worsen performance in the variables agility and body balance. Therefore, it is important to offer programs of physical activity that improve aspects of physical fitness related to the health of individuals hospitalized for treatment of chemical dependence, especially for those with a longer time of drug and alcohol use.
Downloads
References
2. Klinker CD, Schipperijn J, Christian H, Kerr J, Ersboll AK, Troelsen J. Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children's school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:8.
3.Carson V, Hunter S, Kuzik N, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Chaput JP, et al. Systematic review of sedentary behaviour and health indicators in school-aged children and youth: an update. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S240-65.
4. Loprinzi PD, Cardinal BJ, Loprinzi KL, Lee H. Benefits and environmental determinants of physical activity in children and adolescents. Obes Facts. 2012;5(4):597-10.
5. Perdue WC, Stone LA, Gostin LO. The built environment and its relationship to the public's health: the legal framework. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9):1390-4.
6. Sallis JF, Floyd MF, Rodríguez DA, Saelens BE. Role of built environments in physical activity, obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2012;125(5):729-37.
7. Ruijsbroek A, Droomers M, Kruize H, van Kempen E, Gidlow CJ, Hurst G, et al. Does the health impact of exposure to neighbourhood green space differ between population groups? An Explorative Study in Four European Cities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(6):15.
8. Van den Berg M, van Poppel M, van Kamp I, Andrusaityte S, Balseviciene B, Cirach M, et al. Visiting green space is associated with mental health and vitality: A cross-sectional study in four european cities. Health Place. 2016;38:8-15.
9. Ward JS, Duncan JS, Jarden A, Stewart T. The impact of children's exposure to greenspace on physical activity, cognitive development, emotional wellbeing, and ability to appraise risk. Health Place. 2016;40:44-50.
10. McCracken DS, Allen DA, Gow AJ. Associations between urban greenspace and health-related quality of life in children. Prev Med Rep. 2016;3:211-21.
11. Larson LR, Jennings V, Cloutier SA. Public parks and wellbeing in urban areas of the United States. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153211.
12. Kaczynski AT, Henderson KA. Parks and recreation settings and active living: a review of associations with physical activity function and intensity. J Phys Act Health. 2008;5(4):619-32.
13.Bedimo-Rung AL, Mowen AJ, Cohen DA. The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: a conceptual model. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):159-68.
14. Dunton GF, Almanza E, Jerrett M, Wolch J, Pentz MA. Neighborhood park use by children: use of accelerometry and global positioning systems. Am J Prev Med . 2014;46(2):136-42.
15. Bohn-Goldbaum EE, Phongsavan P, Merom D, Rogers K, Kamalesh V, Bauman AE. Does playground improvement increase physical activity among children? A quasi-experimental study of a natural experiment. J Environ Public Health. 2013;2013:9.
16. Schoeppe S, Duncan MJ, Badland HM, Oliver M, Browne M. Associations between children's independent mobility and physical activity. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:91.
17. Kurka JM, Adams MA, Todd M, Colburn T, Sallis JF, Cain KL, et al. Patterns of neighborhood environment attributes in relation to children's physical activity. Health Place. 2015;34:164-70.
18. Janssen I, Rosu A. Undeveloped green space and free-time physical activity in 11 to 13-year-old children. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:26.
19. Floyd MF, Bocarro JN, Smith WR, Baran PK, Moore RC, Cosco NG, et al. Park-based physical activity among children and adolescents. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(3):258-65.
20. McKenzie TL, Cohen DA, Sehgal A, Williamson S, Golinelli D. System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC): reliability and feasibility measures. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3(Suppl 1):S208-22.
21. Ward P, McKenzie TL, Cohen D, Evenson KR, Golinelli D, Hillier A, et al. Physical activity surveillance in parks using direct observation. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:130147.
22. Cohen DA, Setodji C, Evenson KR, Ward P, Lapham S, Hillier A, et al. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(8):1117-23.
23. Santos MP, Rech CR, Alberico CO, Fermino RC, Rios AP, David J, et al. Utility and reliability of an App for the System for Observing Play and Recreation in Communities (iSOPARC®). Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci. 2016;20(2):93-8.
24. Besenyi GM, Kaczynski AT, Wilhelm Stanis SA, Vaughan KB. Demographic variations in observed energy expenditure across park activity areas. Prev Med. 2013;56(1):79-81.
25. McCormack GR, Rock M, Toohey AM, Hignell D. Characteristics of urban parks associated with park use and physical activity: a review of qualitative research. Health Place. 2010;16(4):712-26.
26. Brockman R, Fox KR, Jago R. What is the meaning and nature of active play for today's children in the UK? Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:15.
27. Baran PK, Smith WR, Moore RC, Floyd MF, Bocarro JN, Cosco NG, et al. park use among youth and adults: examination of individual, social, and urban form factors. Environ Behav. 2014;46(6):768-800.
28. Lee AC, Jordan HC, Horsley J. Value of urban green spaces in promoting healthy living and wellbeing: prospects for planning. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015;8:131-7.
29. Fraser SD, Lock K. Cycling for transport and public health: a systematic review of the effect of the environment on cycling. Eur J Public Health. 2011;21(6):738-43.
30. Roemmich JN, Johnson L. Seasonal alterations in park visitation, amenity use, and physical activity-Grand Forks, North Dakota, 2012-2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014;11:e155.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Bruno Malagodi, Márcia Greguol, Helio Serassuelo Junior
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a 