Commute to school, level of physical activity, and physical fitness of young adolescents in the Municipality of Florestal, Minas Gerais
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.22n6p554-560Keywords:
Adolescents, Physical fitness, Physical activityAbstract
This study aimed to evaluate performance in physical fitness tests and physical activity level when comparing the level of physical activity and performance in physical fitness tests among adolescents who moved in three different ways to school.The sample was 60 students (50% female), divided equally into three groups: walk, bike and motorized transport, aged between 15 and 18 years (16,38 ±0,86 years). The physical fitness was evaluated by means of the six-minute run/walk tests, horizontal jump test and 20m maximal speed run. The physical activity score was estimated by the brief IPAQ version. The time and distance displaced by each school was estimated through the Global Positioning System by the Google Maps application. The main findings were that in the physical fitness evaluation, in neither test and for both sexes were found significant differences in physical performance of the three groups. But we found differences in physical activity levels between the walking and motorized transport groups. And the distance traveled by the motorized group was higher than that of the other groups, in both sexes, and the mean total time spent to perform the displacement in the bicycle group in both sexes was smaller. The differences in time or distance between the groups were not able to produce an e ect on the physical fitness. We concluded that the walking group presents a higher level of physical activity to the other groups, pedaling and motorized, suggesting that walking improves physical tness due to time spent on the course.
Downloads
References
2. Stevenson M, Thompson J, de Sá TH, Ewing R, Mohan D, McClure R, et al. Land use, transport, and population health: estimating the health benefits of compact cities. Lancet. 2016;388(10062):2925-35.
3. Carlson JA, Saelens BE, Kerr J, Schipperijn J, Conway TL, Frank LD, et al. Association between neighborhood walkability and GPS-measured walking, bicycling and vehicle time in adolescents. Health Place. 2015;32:1-7.
4. Boreham C, Riddoch C. e physical activity, tness and health of children. J Sports Sci. 2001;19:915-29.
5. TammelinT, Nayha S, LaitinenJ, Rintamaki H, JarvelinMR. Physical activity and social status in adolescence as predictors of physical inactivity in adulthood. Prev Med. 2003;37:375-81.
6. Rech RR, da Rosa CO, Avrela PR, Halpern R, Costanzi CB, Bergmann MLA, et al. Associated factors to active commute in school children. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2013;18(3):332-8.
7. Matsudo S, Araujo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, et al. International Physical Activity Questionnaire: validity and reliability in Brazil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2001;6(2):5-18.
8. Marshall A, Bauman A. The international physical activity questionnaire: summary report of the Reliability & Validity Studies. Produzido pelo Comitê Executivo do IPAQ. IPAQ - Summary, Mar. 2001.
9. Smith L, Norgate SH, Cherrett T, Davies N, Winstanley C, Harding M. Walking school buses as a form of active transportation for children-a review of the evidence. J Sch Health. 2015;85(3):197-210.
10.Tudor-locke C, Ainsworth BE, Popkin BM. Active commuting to school: an overlooked source of childrens’ physical activity? Sports Med. 2001;31:309-13.
11. Faulkner GE, Buliung RN, Flora PK., Fusco C. Active school transport, physical activity levels and body weight of children and youth: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2009;48(1):3-8.
12. Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Wang H, Andersen LB, Froberg K, Page AS. Active travel to school and cardiovascular fitness in Danish children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38:1724-31.
13. Heelan KA, Donnelly JE, Jacobsen DJ, Mayo MS, Washburn R, Greene L. Active commuting to and from school and BMI in elementary school children preliminary data. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31:341-9.
14. Hu G, Sarti C, Jousilahti P, Silventoinen K, Barengo NC, Tuomilehto J. Leisure time, occupational, and commuting physical activity and the risk of stroke. Stroke. 2005;36:1994-9.
15. Dora C. A different route to health: implications of transport policies. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1999;318:16869
16. World Health Organization - WHO (2004). Global Strategy on diet, physical activity and health - Fifty-seventh World Health Assembly. Disponível em: url:http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/strategy/eb11344/strategy_english_web.pdf.
17. Pardini R, Matsudo SMM, Matsudo VKR, Araújo T, Andrade E, Braggion E. Validation of international physical activity questionnaire (IPAQ): pilot study in Brazilian young adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29(6):S5-9.
18. PROJETO ESPORTE BRASIL: manual. Disponível em: url: https://www.proesp.ufrgs.br.
19. Saksvig BI, Catellier DJ, Pfei er K, Schmitz KH, Conway T, Going S, et al. Travel by Walking Before and After School and Physical Activity Among Adolescent Girls. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161(2):153-8.
20. Silva KS, Lopes AS, Silva FM. Physical activity in commute to school and free time in children and adolescentes in the city of Joao Pessoa, PB, Brazil. Rev Bras Ciênc Mov. 2007;15:61-70.
21. Mendoza JA, Watson K, Nguyen N, Cerin E, Baranowski T, Nicklas TA. Active Commuting to School and Association with Physical Activity and Adiposity Among US Youth. J Phys Act Health. 2011;8(4):488-95.
22. Blair SN, Cheng Y, Holder JS. Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in de ning health benefits? Med Sci Sports Exerc.2001;33(6 Suppl):S379-99.
23. Davison KK, Werder JL, Lawson CT. Children’s Active Commuting to School: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Prev Chronic Dis. 2008;5(3):A100.
24. Pardini R, Matsudo S, Araújo T, Matsudo V, Andrade E, Braggion G, et al. Validation of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ - version 6): pilot study in Brazilian Young adults. RBCM. 2001;9(3):45-51.
25. Garcia LMT, Nahas MV. A bit of history, recente developments, and perspectives for research in physical activity and health in Brazil. Rev Bras Educ Fís Esporte. 2010;24(1):135-48.
26. Benedetti TRB, Antunes PC, Rodriguez-Añez CR, Mazo GZ, Petroski EL. Reliability and validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) in older males. Rev Bras Med Esporte, 2007;13(1):11-6.
27. Garcia LMT, Osti RFI, Ribeiro EHC, Florindo AA. Validation of two questionnaires for evaluation of physical activity in adults. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2013;18(3):317-31.
28. Souza WD, Vidal Filho JN, Ribeiro CAAS, Lisboa Filho J, Franklin D. Voluntary Geographic Information in Pantanal: a web system collaborative using API Google Maps. Anais 4o Simpósio de Geotecnologias no Pantanal, Bonito, MS, 20-24 de outubro 2012. Embrapa Informática Agropecuária/INPE, p. 763 -72. Disponível em: url www.dpi.ufv.br/~jugurta/ papers/geopantanal-p131.pdf.
29. Saelens BE, Sallis JF, Frank LD. Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003;25(2):80-91.
30. Timperio A, Ball K, Salmon J, Roberts R, Giles-Corti B, Simmons D, et al. Personal, family, social, and environmental correlates of active commuting to school. Am J Prev Med. 2006;30(1):45–51.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Jennifer de Oliveira, Afonso Simplício, Daniel Leite, Guilherme Pussieldi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
When submitting a manuscript to the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, the authors retain the copyright to the article and authorize the Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde to publish the manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License and identify it as the original publication source.