Efeito de dois programas na promoção da atividade física em idosos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.23e0034Keywords:
Atividade motora, Educação em saúde, Intervenção, IdosoAbstract
The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of two physical activity promotion programs on levels of physical activity in older adults users of Health Care Units from Florianopolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Fifty older adults (68.30 ± 7.01 years old) participated in the study, randomized in three groups: a) Behavior Change (Active Life Improving Health Program – VAMOS); b) Physical Exercise; c) Control. e accelerometer (GT3x, Actigraph) was used to evaluate the level of physical activity at the baseline, three (end of program), six, and 12 months (follow-up). Main effect of time was observed for light and moderate/ vigorous physical activity, with increases after six and three months, respectively, compared with baseline (p < 0.050), independently of the group. ere was no main effect of group or interaction (group vs. time), showing that the groups submitted to physical activity programs did not differed between them and from control group. ere was no significant influence of the attendance on intervention programs on physical activity levels. Then, it was concluded that the physical activity promotion programs assessed were able to increase the daily time spent in physical activity, suggesting the need for adaptations in the structure and in the implementation form of these programs.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. Chodzko-Zajko WJ, Proctor DN, Singh MAF, Minson CT, Nigg CR, Salem GJ, et al. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. American College of Sports Medicine. Position stand. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41(7):1510-30.
2. Benedetti TRB, Gonçalves LHT, Mota JAPS. Uma proposta de política pública de atividade física para idosos. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2007;16(3):387-98.
3. Reis RS, Hallal PC, Parra DC, Ribeiro IC, Brownson RC, Pratt M, et al. Promoting physical activity through community- wide policies and planning: ndings from Curitiba, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7[Suppl 2]:S137-45.
4. Borges LJ, Benedetti TRB, Mazo GZ. Exercício físico, déficits cognitivos e aptidão funcional de idosos usuários dos Centros de saúde de Florianópolis. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2008;13(3):167-77.
5. Benedetti TRB, Schwingel A, Gomez LSR, Chodzko- Zajko W. Programa “VAMOS” (Vida Ativa Melhorando a Saúde): da concepção aos primeiros resultados. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2012;14(6):723-37.
6. Opdenacker J, Boen F, Coorevits N, Delecluse C. Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention and a structured exercise intervention in older adults. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):518-24.
7. Griffin SF, Wilcox S, Ory MG, Lattimore D, Leviton L, Castro C, et al. Results from the Active for Life process evaluation: program delivery delity and adaptations. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):325-42.
8. Wilcox S, Dowda M, Gri n SF, Rheaume C, Ory MG, Leviton L, et al. Results of the first year of active for life: translation of 2 evidence-based physical activity programs for older adults into community settings. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(7):1201-9.
9. Finck BC, Monteiro SM, Barradas SC, Sarmiento OL, Rios P, Ramirez A, et al. Physical activity, nutrition and behavior change in Latin America: a systematic review. Glob Health Promot. 2013;20(4 Suppl):65-81.
10. WHO. World Health Organization, Dept. of Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
11. Uauy R, Albala C, Kain J. Obesity trends in Latin America: transiting from under-to overweight. J Nutr. 2001;131(3):893S-899S
12. Bandura A, Azzi RG, Polydoro S. Teoria social cognitiva: conceitos básicos. In: Bandura A. A evolução da teoria social cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2008.
13. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26.
14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
15. Lipschitz DA. Screening for nutritional status in the elderly. Primary Care. 1994;21(1):55-67.
16. WHO. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: Report of WHO a consultation; 2000.
17. Trost SG, Mciver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531-43.
18. Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(10):1167-72.
19. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP. Accelerometer use in Physical Activity: Best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S582-8.
20. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-81.
21. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
22. Westerterp KR. Physical activity as determinant of daily energy expenditure. Physiol Behav. 2008;93(4-5):1039-43.
23. Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, Pruitt L, Conway TL, Cain KL, et al. Objective Light-Intensity Physycal Activity Associations With Rated Health in Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(10):1155-65.
24. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW 3rd, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardio respiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(4):327-34.
25. Andersen RE, Wadden TA, Bartlett SJ, Zemel B, Verde TJ, Franckowiak SC. Effects of lifestyle activity vs. structured aerobic exercise in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999; 281(4):335-40.
26. Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP, Chmelo E, Prescott AJ, Dobrosielski M, Walkup MP, et al. e Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P): 2-year follow-up. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(4):462-7.
27. LIFE Study Investigators, Pahor M, Blair SN, Espeland M, Fielding R, Gill TM, Guralnik JM, et al. E ects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: Results of the lifestyle interventions and independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(11):1157-65.
28. Borges RA. Programa de promoção de atividade física no SUS: barreiras e facilitadores organizacionais [dissertação de mestrado em Educação Física]. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física, Centro de Desportos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2014.
29. Costa BV, Bottcher LB, Kokubun E. Aderência a um programa de atividade física e fatores associados. Motriz. 2009;15(1):25-36.
2. Benedetti TRB, Gonçalves LHT, Mota JAPS. Uma proposta de política pública de atividade física para idosos. Texto Contexto Enferm. 2007;16(3):387-98.
3. Reis RS, Hallal PC, Parra DC, Ribeiro IC, Brownson RC, Pratt M, et al. Promoting physical activity through community- wide policies and planning: ndings from Curitiba, Brazil. J Phys Act Health. 2010;7[Suppl 2]:S137-45.
4. Borges LJ, Benedetti TRB, Mazo GZ. Exercício físico, déficits cognitivos e aptidão funcional de idosos usuários dos Centros de saúde de Florianópolis. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2008;13(3):167-77.
5. Benedetti TRB, Schwingel A, Gomez LSR, Chodzko- Zajko W. Programa “VAMOS” (Vida Ativa Melhorando a Saúde): da concepção aos primeiros resultados. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum. 2012;14(6):723-37.
6. Opdenacker J, Boen F, Coorevits N, Delecluse C. Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention and a structured exercise intervention in older adults. Prev Med. 2008;46(6):518-24.
7. Griffin SF, Wilcox S, Ory MG, Lattimore D, Leviton L, Castro C, et al. Results from the Active for Life process evaluation: program delivery delity and adaptations. Health Educ Res. 2010;25(2):325-42.
8. Wilcox S, Dowda M, Gri n SF, Rheaume C, Ory MG, Leviton L, et al. Results of the first year of active for life: translation of 2 evidence-based physical activity programs for older adults into community settings. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(7):1201-9.
9. Finck BC, Monteiro SM, Barradas SC, Sarmiento OL, Rios P, Ramirez A, et al. Physical activity, nutrition and behavior change in Latin America: a systematic review. Glob Health Promot. 2013;20(4 Suppl):65-81.
10. WHO. World Health Organization, Dept. of Chronic Diseases and Health Promotion. Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.
11. Uauy R, Albala C, Kain J. Obesity trends in Latin America: transiting from under-to overweight. J Nutr. 2001;131(3):893S-899S
12. Bandura A, Azzi RG, Polydoro S. Teoria social cognitiva: conceitos básicos. In: Bandura A. A evolução da teoria social cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2008.
13. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1-26.
14. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: W.H. Freeman; 1997.
15. Lipschitz DA. Screening for nutritional status in the elderly. Primary Care. 1994;21(1):55-67.
16. WHO. World Health Organization. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: Report of WHO a consultation; 2000.
17. Trost SG, Mciver KL, Pate RR. Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S531-43.
18. Gretebeck RJ, Montoye HJ. Variability of some objective measures of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24(10):1167-72.
19. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP. Accelerometer use in Physical Activity: Best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11 Suppl):S582-8.
20. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-81.
21. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
22. Westerterp KR. Physical activity as determinant of daily energy expenditure. Physiol Behav. 2008;93(4-5):1039-43.
23. Buman MP, Hekler EB, Haskell WL, Pruitt L, Conway TL, Cain KL, et al. Objective Light-Intensity Physycal Activity Associations With Rated Health in Older Adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2010;172(10):1155-65.
24. Dunn AL, Marcus BH, Kampert JB, Garcia ME, Kohl HW 3rd, Blair SN. Comparison of lifestyle and structured interventions to increase physical activity and cardio respiratory fitness: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999;281(4):327-34.
25. Andersen RE, Wadden TA, Bartlett SJ, Zemel B, Verde TJ, Franckowiak SC. Effects of lifestyle activity vs. structured aerobic exercise in obese women: a randomized trial. JAMA. 1999; 281(4):335-40.
26. Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP, Chmelo E, Prescott AJ, Dobrosielski M, Walkup MP, et al. e Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P): 2-year follow-up. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009;64(4):462-7.
27. LIFE Study Investigators, Pahor M, Blair SN, Espeland M, Fielding R, Gill TM, Guralnik JM, et al. E ects of a physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance: Results of the lifestyle interventions and independence for Elders Pilot (LIFE-P) study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61(11):1157-65.
28. Borges RA. Programa de promoção de atividade física no SUS: barreiras e facilitadores organizacionais [dissertação de mestrado em Educação Física]. Florianópolis, Santa Catarina: Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Física, Centro de Desportos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2014.
29. Costa BV, Bottcher LB, Kokubun E. Aderência a um programa de atividade física e fatores associados. Motriz. 2009;15(1):25-36.
Downloads
Published
2018-11-21
How to Cite
1.
Scherer FC, Gerage AM, Borges LJ, Borges RA, Melo FC de, Teixeira D de C, et al. Efeito de dois programas na promoção da atividade física em idosos. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 2018 Nov. 21 [cited 2024 May 18];23:1-9. Available from: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/12724
Issue
Section
Original Articles
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a 