Atividade Física e estrutura RE-AIM: uma análise bibliométrica da produção científica na Web Of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.30e0386Palavras-chave:
Exercício físico, Avaliação da efetividade-efetividade das intervenções, Literatura de revisão como assuntoResumo
Objetivo: Este estudo utilizou uma análise bibliométrica usando a base de dados Web of Science com o objetivo de analisar as tendências acadêmicas relacionadas à interseção entre a estrutura RE-AIM e a atividade física (AF). Métodos: Os indicadores de produtividade bibliométrica incluíram padrões de publicação, distribuição cronológica das publicações anuais, identificação dos periódicos mais relevantes, os autores mais prolíficos e citados, os documentos mais citados, bem como visualização em rede para coautoria, colaboração internacional e coocorrência de palavras-chave do autor. A busca foi realizada em abril de 2024 utilizando os descritores controlados “RE-AIM” AND (“atividade física” OR “exercício físico” OR “atividade motora”). Resultados: Um total de 353 artigos foram incluídos para análise. Os artigos foram publicados entre 2002 e 2024, distribuídos em 122 periódicos. A taxa de crescimento anual dos artigos foi de 7,6%, com média de 24,53 citações. As instituições e autores mais prolíficos eram dos Estados Unidos, Austrália e Canadá. A análise fatorial das palavras-chave indicou a presença de um cluster principal abrangendo temas como intervenções de AF, o impacto da estrutura RE-AIM, saúde, exercício, implementação e promoção da saúde em vários contextos populacionais. Houve predominância de estudos realizados nos Estados Unidos, seguidos pela Austrália e Canadá, com crescente contribuição de países como o Brasil. Conclusão: A presente síntese forneceu uma visão geral da aplicação global da estrutura RE-AIM. Sugere-se que mais pesquisas explorem a aplicabilidade e a relação dessa ferramenta na avaliação de intervenções de AF em diversos contextos socioculturais, incluindo países de baixa e média renda.
Downloads
Referências
World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behavior [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2020; Available from: <https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/336656> [2024 Jul].
Strain T, Flaxman S, Guthold R, Semenova E, Cowan M, Riley LM, et al. National, regional, and global trends in insufficient physical activity among adults from 2000 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 507 population-based surveys with 5·7 million participants. Lancet Glob Health. 2024;12(8):e1232-e1243.
World Health Organization. Global levels of physical inactivity in adults: Off track for 2030. Summary report on global levels [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024. Available from: <https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059153> [2024 Jun].
Guerra PH, Soares HF, Mafra AB, Czarnobai I, Cruz GA, Weber WV, et al. Educational interventions for physical activity among Brazilian adults: systematic review. Rev Saude Publica. 2021;55:110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003236
Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S,et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60816-2
Kettle VE, Madigan CD, Coombe A, Graham H, Thomas JJC, Chalkley AE, et al. Effectiveness of physical activity interventions delivered or prompted by health professionals in primary care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2022;376:e068465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2021-068465
Stephenson A, McDonough SM, Murphy MH, Nugent CD, Mair JL. Using computer, mobile and wearable technology enhanced interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0561-4
Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38-e46.
Glasgow RE, Harden SM, Gaglio B, Rabin B, Smith ML, Porter GC, et al. RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review. Front Public Health. 2019;7:64. . DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064
Benedetti TRB, Schwingel A, Chodzko-Zajko W, Meurer ST, Brito FA, Almeida FA. RE-AIM: uma proposta de avaliação de programas de atividade física. Kairós-Gerontologia. 2014;17(2):295-314.
Estabrooks PA, Gyurcsik, NC. Evaluating the impact of behavioral interventions that target physical activity: issues of generalizability and public health. Psychology of sport and exercise. 2003;4(1):41-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00016-X
Jauregui E, Pacheco AM, Soltero EG, O'Connor TM, Castro CM, Estabrooks PA, et al. Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate physical activity public health programs in México. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1474-2
Koorts H, Gillison F. Mixed method evaluation of a community-based physical activity program using the RE-AIM framework: practical application in a real-world setting. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:1102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2466-y
Donthu N, Kumar S, Mukherjee D, Pandey N, Lim WM. How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research. 2021;133:285-96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Aria M, Cuccurullo C. Bibliometria: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. J. Informetr. 2017;11(4):959-975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods. 2015;18(3):429-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Büyükkidik SA. A bibliometric analysis: A tutorial for the bibliometrix package in R using IRT literature. J. Meas. Eval. Educ. Psychol. 2022;13(3):164-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1069307
Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9):1322-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.89.9.1322
Lee RE, Galavíz KI, Soltero EG, Rosales Chavez J, Jauregui E, Lévesque L, et al. Applying the RE-AIM conceptual framework for the promotion of physical activity in low-and middle-income countries. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem. 2017;25:e2923. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.1894.2923
Brito FA, Benedetti TRB, Tomicki C, Konrad LM, Sandreschi PF, Manta SW, et al. Tradução e adaptação do Check List RE-AIM para a realidade Brasileira. Rev Bras Ativ Fis Saúde. 2018;23:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.23e0033
Konrad L, Tomicki C, Silva M, Almeida F, Benedetti T. Avaliação de programas de mudança de comportamento usando a ferramenta RE-AIM: um estudo de revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde. 2018;22(5):439-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.v.22n5p439-449
Quadros EN, Maciel EC, Konrad LM, Ribeiro CG, Lopes ACS, Meurer ST, et al. Avaliação da efetividade do “VAMOS” no contexto do programa academia da saúde: Um estudo qualitativo. Movimento. 2020;26:e26023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.94432
Squarcini CFR, Rocha SV, Munaro HLR, Benedetti TRB, Almeida FA. Physical activity programs for elderly persons: An evaluation of Brazilian scientific production using the RE-AIM framework. Rev bras geriatr gerontol. 2015;18:909-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-9823.2015.14103
Tomicki C, Rech CR, Konrad L, Bezerra JB, Ribeiro CG, Schwingel A, et al. Adoption of an intervention to promote physical activity and healthy eating in Brazilian health care settings. Rev Argent Cienc Comport. 2023;13:35-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32348/1852.4206.v15.n1.32202
Biddle SJH, Batterham AM. High-intensity interval exercise training for public health: a big HIT or shall we HIT it on the head?. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:1-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0254-9
Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Bull S, Glasgow RE. Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?. Health Promot Int. 2004;19(2):235-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dah211
Gaglio B, Shoup JA, Glasgow RE. The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(6):e38-e46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299
Glasgow RE, Bull SS, Gillette C, Klesges LM, Dzewaltowski DA. Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity. Am J Prev Med. 2002;23(1):62-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00437-3
Kohl LF, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(7):e146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2665
Klesges LM, Estabrooks PA, Dzewaltowski DA, Bull SS, Glasgow RE. Beginning with the application in mind: designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29(Suppl):66-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2902s_10
Lewis BA, Napolitano MA, Buman MP, Williams DM, Nigg CR. Future directions in physical activity intervention research: expanding our focus to sedentary behaviors, technology, and dissemination. J Behav Med. 2017;40(1):112-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9797-8
Reis RS, Salvo D, Ogilvie D, Lambert EV, Goenka S, Brownson RC. Scaling up physical activity interventions worldwide: stepping up to larger and smarter approaches to get people moving. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1337-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30728-0
Stellefson M, Chaney B, Barry AE, Chavarria E, Tennant B, Walsh-Childers K, et al. Web 2.0 chronic disease self-management for older adults: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2439
Bhuiyan N, Singh P, Harden SM, Mama SK. Rural physical activity interventions in the United States: a systematic review and RE-AIM evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019;16(1):140. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-019-0903-5
Galaviz KI, Harden SM, Smith E, Blackman KC, Berrey LM, Mama SK, et al. Physical activity promotion in Latin American populations: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11(77). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-11-77
Silva JAD, Gonçalves ECDA, Silva DAS, Silva KS. Programas de intervenção para atividade física nas escolas brasileiras: Revisão com base no modelo RE-AIM. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2019;24:3443-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018249.23502017
Kennedy SG, Sanders T, Estabrooks PA, Smith JJ, Lonsdale C, Foster C, et al. Implementation at-scale of school-based physical activity interventions: A systematic review utilizing the RE-AIM framework. Obes Rev. 2021;22(7):e13184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.13184
Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, Inoue S, Alkandari JR, Leetongin G, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294-305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60898-8
World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2018; Available from: <https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/272722> [2024 Jul].
World Health Organization. Global action plan on physical activity 2018–2030: More active people for a healthier world. World Health Organization: Geneva. 2022; Available from: <https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240059153> [2024 Jul].
Laranjo L, Ding D, Heleno B, Kocaballi B, Quiroz JC, Tong HL, et al. Do smartphone applications and activity trackers increase physical activity in adults? Systematic review, meta-analysis and metaregression. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(8):422-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2020-102892
Pradal-Cano L, Lozano-Ruiz C, Pereyra-Rodríguez JJ, Saigí-Rubió F, Bach-Faig A, Esquius L, et al. Using Mobile Applications to Increase Physical Activity: A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):8238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17218238
Zangger G, Bricca A, Liaghat B, Juhl CB, Mortensen SR, Andersen RM, et al. Benefits and Harms of Digital Health Interventions Promoting Physical Activity in People With Chronic Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e46439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/46439
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2025 Jean Carlos de Goveia, Leandro Martinez Vargas, Miguel Archanjo de Freitas Júnior, Bruno Pedroso, Gonçalo Cassins Moreira do Carmo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ao submeter um manuscrito à Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, os autores mantêm a titularidade dos direitos autorais sobre o artigo, e autorizam a Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde a publicar esse manuscrito sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 e identificá-la como veículo de sua publicação original.
