Atividade física, comportamento sedentário e sono medidos por smartwatch: protocolo de revisão de escopo

Autores

  • José Francisco da Silva University of Pernambuco, Graduated Program in Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0934-9826
  • Antonio Henrique Germano Soares University of Pernambuco, Graduated Program in Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Pernambucana Faculty of Health, Department of Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0327-4739
  • Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho Federal Institute of Ceara – Aracati Campus, Department of Education, Aracati, Ceara, Brazil. Ceara State University, Graduate Program on Collective Health, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4769-4068
  • Jessica Gomes Mota University of Pernambuco, Graduated Program in Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7358-0814
  • Luis Carlos Barbosa Silva University of Pernambuco, Graduated Program in Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8760-1014
  • Tuillamys Virgínio Oliveira University of Pernambuco, Graduated Program in Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. Pernambucana Faculty of Health, Department of Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8808-5085
  • Rafael Miranda Tassitano Federal Rural University of Pernambuco, Department of Physical Education, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-8670

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.28e0301

Palavras-chave:

Dispositivos eletrônicos vestíveis, Atividade física, Comportamento sedentário, Sono

Resumo

Os impactos da atividade física (AF), comportamento sedentário (CS) e sono na saúde são bem estabelecidos, tornando-se relevante identificar instrumentos que permitam avaliar e monitorar esses comportamentos em nível populacional. Nesse contexto, os smartwatches, que são dispositivos em formato de relógio de pulso, compostos por sensores, tem sido apontado como alternativa para mensurar objetivamente AF, CS e sono. Portanto, o objetivo deste protocolo foi descrever os objetivos e métodos de uma revisão de escopo para mapear a literatura científica sobre o uso de smartwatches para medir objetivamente AF, CS e/ou sono em diferentes populações e contextos. Os estudos serão incluídos se usarem smartwatches para medir objetivamente pelo menos um dos comportamentos (AF, CS e sono) em crianças, adolescentes, adultos e idosos, publicados após 2013. Nenhum filtro de idioma será aplicado. As buscas serão realizadas em sete bases de dados (Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore Digital Library, Scielo, LILACS, Health Technology Assessment Database e Cochrane Clinical Trials) e dois repositórios de ensaios clínicos. A triagem e extração dos dados serão realizadas de forma independente por dois autores com experiência prévia em revisões e tecnologias. A síntese dos resultados seguirá o framework do Joanna Briggs Institute para extração dos resultados nas revisões de escopo. Os resultados podem contribuir para o progresso científico, identificando lacunas e tendências de pesquisa, orientando futuros estudos, empresas que atuam neste mercado, profissionais de saúde e o público em geral que utilizam smartwatch como um instrumento de medição para atividade física, comportamento sedentário e sono.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

Pedišić Ž, Dumuid D, S Olds T. Integrating sleep, sedentary behaviour, and physical activity research in the emerging field of time-use epidemiology: definitions, concepts, statistical methods, theoretical framework, and future directions. Kinesiology. 2017;49(2.):252-69.

Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2019;366:l4570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4570

Buysse DJ. Sleep health: can we define it? Does it matter? Sleep. 2014;37(1):9-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.3298

Rollo S, Antsygina O, Tremblay MS. The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. JSHS. 2020;9(6):493-510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004

Rosenberger ME, Fulton JE, Buman MP, Troiano RP, Grandner MA, Buchner DM, et al. The 24-Hour Activity Cycle: A New Paradigm for Physical Activity. MSSE. 2019;51(3):454-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000001811

Falck RS, Davis JC, Khan KM, Handy TC, Liu-Ambrose T. A Wrinkle in Measuring Time Use for Cognitive Health: How should We Measure Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour and Sleep? Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;0(0):15598276211031495.

Shephard R. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. BJSM. 2003;37(3):197-206; . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.3.197

Sasaki J, Silva K, Gonçalves Galdino da Costa B. Uso de acelerômetros para mensurar atividade física e comportamento sedentário: o que precisamos saber? Florianópolis: Midiograf, 2018.

Douglas NJ, Thomas S, Jan MA. Clinical value of polysomnography. Lancet. 1992;339(8789):347-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)91660-Z

Andretic R, Franken P, Tafti M. Genetics of sleep. Ann Rev Genet. 2008;42:361-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091541

Rawassizadeh R, Price BA, Petre MJCotA. Wearables: Has the age of smartwatches finally arrived? Commun ACM. 2014;58(1):45-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2629633

Arriba-Pérez D, Caeiro-Rodríguez M, Santos-Gago JM. Collection and processing of data from wrist wearable devices in heterogeneous and multiple-user scenarios. Sensors. 2016;16(9):1538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s16091538

Surveillance Studies Centre/SSC. Left to their own devices? Privacy implications of wearable technology in Canadian workplaces. Canada. 2017; Available from: <https://www.surveillance-studies.ca/sites/sscqueens.org/files/left_to_their_own_devices.pdf> [2022 May].

Henriksen A, Mikalsen MH, Woldaregay AZ, Muzny M, Hartvigsen G, Hopstock LA, et al. Using fitness trackers and smartwatches to measure physical activity in research: analysis of consumer wrist-worn wearables. JMIR 2018;20(3):e9157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9157

Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI, Rammal HG, Veiga PMJCiHB. Wearable technology and consumer interaction: A systematic review and research agenda. Comput Huma Behav. 2021;118:106710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106710

Statista. The global wearables market Is all about the wrist. Germany 2018; Available from: <https://www.statista.com/chart/3370/wearable-device-forecast/> [2022 MAY].

Gartner. Gartner says global end-user spending on wearable devices to total $52 billion in 2020. United Kingdom. 2019; Available from: <https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2019-10-30-gartner-says-global-end-user-spending-on-wearable-dev> [2022 May].

Brickwood KJ, Watson G, O'Brien J, Williams AD. Consumer-Based Wearable Activity Trackers Increase Physical Activity Participation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JMU 2019;7(4):e11819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/11819

Rosenberger ME, Buman MP, Haskell WL, McConnell MV, Carstensen LL. Twenty-four Hours of Sleep, Sedentary Behavior, and Physical Activity with Nine Wearable Devices. MSSE 2016;48(3):457-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000778

Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RDJIJoBN, Activity P. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. IJBNPA. 2015;12(1):1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0314-1

Beck AJ, Duffett-Leger L, Bright KS, Keys EM, Hayden A, Ward TM, et al. Using wearable and mobile technology to measure and promote healthy sleep behaviors in adolescents: a scoping review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2021;19(10):2760-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00293

Degroote L, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Verloigne M, Poppe L, Crombez G. The Accuracy of Smart Devices for Measuring Physical Activity in Daily Life: Validation Study. JMU. 2018;6(12):e10972. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/10972

Mehrabadi MA, Azimi I, Sarhaddi F, Axelin A, Niela-Vilén H, Myllyntausta S, et al. Sleep tracking of a commercially available smart ring and smartwatch against medical-grade actigraphy in everyday settings: instrument validation study. JMU. 2020;8(11):e20465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/20465

Düking P, Giessing L, Frenkel MO, Koehler K, Holmberg H-C, Sperlich B. Wrist-worn wearables for monitoring heart rate and energy expenditure while sitting or performing light-to-vigorous physical activity: validation study. JMU 2020;8(5):e16716. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/16716

Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O'Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Inter Med. 2018;169(7):467-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

Joanna Briggs Institute/JBI. Chapter 11: Scoping reviews. Australia. 2020; Available from:<https://jbi-global-wiki.refined.site/space/MANUAL/4687342/Chapter+11%3A+Scoping+reviews> [2021 June].

Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GMJPhr. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. PHR. 1985;100(2):126.

Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Sedentary Behavior Research Network (SBRN) - Terminology Consensus Project process and outcome. IJBNPA. 2017;14(1):75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8

Bear MF, Connors BW, Paradiso MA. Neurociências: desvendando o sistema nervoso. 2º Ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2002.

QUARTZ. Almost every major consumer electronics manufacturer is now working on a smart watch: New york. QUARTZ; 2013. Available from: <https://qz.com/101058/smart-watch-explosion> [2022 May].

Gadgets 360. Time is ripe for smart watches, say analysts. France. Gadgets 360, 2013. Available from <https://www.gadgets360.com/others/news/time-is-ripe-for-smart-watches-say-analysts-348697> [May 2022].

Reeder B, David A. Health at hand: A systematic review of smart watch uses for health and wellness. J Biomed Inform. 2016;63:269-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.001

Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4

Counterpoint. Smartwatch market grows 24% yoy in 2021, records highest ever quarterly shipments in q4. Hong Kong. 2022. Available from < https://www.counterpointresearch.com/global-smartwatch-market-2021/#:~:text=The%20global%20smartwatch%20market%20shipments,published%20Global%20Smartwatch%20Model%20Tracker.> [June 2022].

Downloads

Publicado

2023-07-27

Como Citar

1.
Silva JF da, Soares AHG, Barbosa Filho VC, Mota JG, Silva LCB, Oliveira TV, et al. Atividade física, comportamento sedentário e sono medidos por smartwatch: protocolo de revisão de escopo. Rev. Bras. Ativ. Fís. Saúde [Internet]. 27º de julho de 2023 [citado 23º de novembro de 2024];28:1-11. Disponível em: https://rbafs.org.br/RBAFS/article/view/15015

Edição

v. 28 (2023)

Seção

Protocolos de estudos em atividade física e saúde

Licença

Copyright (c) 2023 José Francisco da Silva, Antonio Henrique Germano Soares, Valter Cordeiro Barbosa Filho, Jessica Gomes Mota, Luis Carlos Barbosa Silva, Tuillamys Virgínio Oliveira, Rafael Miranda Tassitano

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ao submeter um manuscrito à Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, os autores mantêm a titularidade dos direitos autorais sobre o artigo, e autorizam a Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde a publicar esse manuscrito sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 e identificá-la como veículo de sua publicação original.