Associação entre walkability e atividade física: um protocolo para revisão sistemática e meta-análise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12820/rbafs.27e0284Palavras-chave:
Walkability, Atividade física, Meta-análise, Revisão sistemática, Fases do ciclo de vidaResumo
A área adequada para caminhada, relacionada ao fluxo de caminhada, nas calçadas e travessias (walkability) influencia na prática de atividade física. No entanto, não há evidências de meta análises que tenham avaliado essa associação. Portanto, este estudo apresenta um protocolo para avaliar a associação entre walkability e atividade física. O protocolo de revisão sistemática será realizado seguindo as recomendações do PRISMA 2020 e incluirá uma busca nas seguintes bases de dados: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, LILACS, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase e Cochrane. Serão incluídos estudos observacionais, transversais e longitudinais, que avaliaram a associação entre walkability na vizinhança e atividade física. O processo de seleção dos estudos será conduzido de forma independente por dois revisores. O processo terá início pela leitura dos títulos e resumos de interesse, seguido da leitura completa dos artigos por meio da plataforma Rayyan. Avaliaremos a qualidade metodológica e individual entre os estudos utilizando a Escala de Newcastle Ottawa (NOS) e o teste Qui-Quadrado (I2). Para testar a influência das variáveis nos resultados da meta-análise, utilizaremos, sempre que possível, a técnica de meta-regressão. Os resultados da meta-análise serão apresentados como Odds Ratio (OR) com intervalo de confiança de 95%, por meio de um modelo de efeitos aleatórios ou fixos, de acordo com a estimativa clínica, estatística e metodológica da heterogeneidade. Se possível, serão realizadas estratificações de acordo com faixa etária, sexo e níveis de atividade física. Com os resultados do estudo, esperamos que o conhecimento seja útil para incentivar a implementação de políticas públicas de walkability no bairro para aumentar os níveis de atividade física.
Downloads
Referências
Hallal PC, Victora CG, Azevedo MR, Wells JCK. Adolescent physical activity and health: A systematic review. Sports Med. 2006;36(12):1019–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200636120-00003
Landry BW, Driscoll SW. Physical activity in children and adolescents. PM and R 2012;4(11):826–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.09.585
Breckenkamp J, Blettner M, Laaser U. Physical activity, cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality: Results from a 14-year follow-up of the German Health Interview Survey. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2004;12(5):321–8.
D A, T N, M L, S T, LJ V. Physical activity and the risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2015;30(7):529–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-015-0056-z
Jakicic JM, Davis KK. Obesity and physical activity. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2011;34(4):829–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.009
Strasser B. Physical activity in obesity and metabolic syndrome. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1281(1):141–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06785.x
Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(9):811–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
Dhalwani NN, O’Donovan G, Zaccardi F, Hamer M, Yates T, Davies M, et al. Long terms trends of multimorbidity and association with physical activity in older English population. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2016;13(1):8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-016-0330-9
Guthold R, Stevens GA, Riley LM, Bull FC. Global trends in insufficient physical activity among adolescents: a pooled analysis of 298 population-based surveys with 1·6 million participants. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(1):23–35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30323-2
Whitfield GP, Carlson SA, Ussery EN, Fulton JE, Galuska DA, Petersen R. Trends in Meeting Physical Activity Guidelines Among Urban and Rural Dwelling Adults — United States, 2008–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(23):513–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6823a1
Ståhl T, Rütten A, Nutbeam D, Bauman A, Kannas L, Abel T, et al. The importance of the social environment for physically active lifestyle - Results from an international study. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(1):1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00116-7
Molina-García J, Queralt A, Adams MA, Conway TL, Sallis JF. Neighborhood built environment and socio-economic status in relation to multiple health outcomes in adolescents. Prev Med (Baltim). 2017;105:88–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.026
Siqueira Reis R, Hino AAF, Ricardo Rech C, Kerr J, Curi Hallal P. Walkability and physical activity: Findings from curitiba, brazil. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45(3):269–75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2013.04.020
Chudyk AM, McKay HA, Winters M, Sims-Gould J, Ashe MC. Neighborhood walkability, physical activity, and walking for transportation: A cross-sectional study of older adults living on low income. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):1–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-017-0469-5
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(15):2008–12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.15.2008
Matthew P, Joanne M, Patrick B, Isabelle B, Tammy H, Cynthia M, et al. PRISMA 2020 statement: updated guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta analyses. 26th Cochrane Colloquium, Santiago, Chile. 2021;134:178-89.
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Schwarzer G. General Package for Meta-Analysis [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2021 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319214153.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [Internet]. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. 2000 [cited 2019 Nov 9]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp
Herzog R, Álvarez-Pasquin MJ, Díaz C, del Barrio JL, Estrada JM, Gil Á. Are healthcare workers intentions to vaccinate related to their knowledge, beliefs and attitudes? A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-154
Jawad M, Vamos EP, Najim M, Roberts B, Millett C. Impact of armed conflict on cardiovascular disease risk: a systematic review. Heart. 2019;105(18):1388–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314459
Jenkins RH, Vamos EP, Taylor-Robinson D, Millett C, Laverty AA. Impacts of the 2008 Great Recession on dietary intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 2021;18(1):1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-021-01125-8
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, et al. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1311–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004
Ruegsegger GN, Booth FW. Health benefits of exercise. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2018 Jul 1;8(7). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a029694
Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Health benefits of physical activity: A systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000437
Marquez DX, Aguinãga S, Vásquez PM, Conroy DE, Erickson KI, Hillman C, et al. A systematic review of physical activity and quality of life and well-being. Transl Behav Med. 2020;10(5):1098–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibz198
Liu-Ambrose TYL, Ashe MC, Marra C. Independent and inverse association of healthcare utilisation with physical activity in older adults with multiple chronic conditions. Br J Sports Med. 2010;44(14):1024–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2008.046458
Kang S wan, Xiang X. Physical activity and health services utilization and costs among U.S. adults. Prev Med (Baltim). 2017;96:101–5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.12.043
Hino AAF, Rech CR, Gonçalves PB, Reis RS. Acessibilidade a espaços públicos de lazer e atividade física em adultos de Curitiba, Paraná, Brasil. Cad Saude Publica. 2019;35(12):e00020719. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00020719
Hajna S, Ross NA, Brazeau AS, Bélisle P, Joseph L, Dasgupta K. Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x
Daskapan A, Tuzun EH, Eker L. Perceived barriers to physical activity in university students. J Sports Sci Med. 2006;5(4):615–20.
Colom A, Mavoa S, Ruiz M, Wärnberg J, Muncunill J, Konieczna J, et al. Neighbourhood walkability and physical activity: moderating role of a physical activity intervention in overweight and obese older adults with metabolic syndrome. Age Ageing. 2021;50(3):963–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa246
Breckenkamp J, Blettner M, Laaser U. Physical activity, cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality: Results from a 14-year follow-up of the German Health Interview Survey. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2004;12(5):321–8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-004-0051-4
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Giancarlo Bazarele Machado Bruno, Felipe Mendes Delpino, Antônio Azambuja Miragem, Leandro André Vieira Olsson, Elza Daniel de Mello
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ao submeter um manuscrito à Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde, os autores mantêm a titularidade dos direitos autorais sobre o artigo, e autorizam a Revista Brasileira de Atividade Física & Saúde a publicar esse manuscrito sob a Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 e identificá-la como veículo de sua publicação original.
